Skip to main content

Is fraud0.com a Scam? Security Check Results - fraud0 Reviews

fraud0.com favicon

Is fraud0.com Safe? Security Analysis for fraud0

Check if fraud0.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
WordPressElementorYoast SEOGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel+3 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 6:19:32 AM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

fraud0 is a technology-focused company specializing in AI-powered bot detection and marketing intelligence solutions. Their website presents a professional and modern interface built on WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO, targeting businesses and marketers seeking to optimize ad campaigns and mitigate click fraud in real time. The company offers services including bot detection, click fraud protection, real-time alerts, and marketing analytics to enable smarter data-driven decisions. Technically, the website leverages multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, PostHog, and Usercentrics for consent management, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure; however, the absence of security headers and explicit security policies suggests room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and reduces overall trustworthiness. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no clear privacy or terms of service pages. Overall, fraud0 demonstrates a solid business and technical foundation but should enhance transparency and security practices to improve trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorYoast SEOGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook PixelPostHogUsercentricsLfeeder

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company positions itself as a niche provider in the bot detection and marketing intelligence market, focusing on AI-driven solutions to combat click fraud and optimize advertising spend. Its business model appears to be SaaS-based, targeting digital marketers and enterprises concerned with ad fraud and data accuracy. The website content and structured data reflect a consistent brand identity and clear messaging. However, the absence of detailed company registration, contact information, and privacy policies limits full business credibility. The use of advanced marketing tools and analytics indicates an investment in growth and customer insights. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly identified, suggesting a standalone operation. The company could benefit from publishing more comprehensive corporate and compliance information to strengthen market confidence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security measures include HTTPS encryption and deployment of a consent management platform, which are positive indicators. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which is a gap in security transparency. The presence of multiple third-party scripts introduces potential risk vectors that require ongoing monitoring. The missing WHOIS data and domain registration ambiguity further complicate trust assessment. To improve security maturity, fraud0 should implement recommended HTTP security headers, publish security policies, and provide clear incident response contacts. Regular security audits and third-party script reviews are also advisable.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

fraud0

Description:

Detect and mitigate bots in real time. Optimize your ad campaigns and make smarter data-driven decisions with holistic insights and alerts.

Key Services:
Bot detectionClick fraud protectionMarketing intelligenceReal-time alertsAd campaign optimization
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorYoast SEOGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook PixelPostHogUsercentricsLfeeder
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of consent management platform (Usercentrics)

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via GTM)PostHog
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsFacebook Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelPostHog
Marketing Tools:
UsercentricsLfeeder
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and fully functional

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

95/100
Score

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

47/100
Score

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:re+vetowftfdi9@dmarc.postmarkapp.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 45 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(2164 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:85.13.132.194
Name Servers:
ns03.domaincontrol.com
ns04.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025090300, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:257ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. It integrates multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, PostHog, and Usercentrics for cookie consent management. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate with preloading of key assets and fonts. However, the absence of detected security headers and incomplete WHOIS data indicate technical gaps in security and domain management. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals but requires enhancements in security configuration and transparency.
Analyze Another Website