Skip to main content

Is fraudblocker.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Fraud Blocker Reviews

fraudblocker.com favicon

Is fraudblocker.com Safe? Security Analysis for Fraud Blocker

Check if fraudblocker.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statessmall
WordPressElementorYoast SEOGoogle Tag ManagerCloudflare DNS
Analyzed 9/4/2025Completed 11:22:49 PM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Fraud Blocker is a small technology company specializing in click fraud protection software designed to save advertisers money by blocking fraudulent clicks on Google Ads. The company positions itself as a leading provider in this niche, targeting advertisers and digital marketing agencies seeking to improve ad campaign efficiency. Founded in 2019, the business leverages a SaaS model to deliver proprietary fraud detection technology. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear messaging focused on its core services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the GeneratePress theme and Elementor page builder, incorporating modern SEO and analytics tools such as Yoast SEO and Google Tag Manager. Hosting and DNS services involve Cloudflare, enhancing performance and security. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and domain registration locked against unauthorized changes, but DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. From a security and compliance perspective, the site lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which impacts privacy compliance scores. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, and no data protection officer contact is provided. Contact information is clearly available, including a company email and phone number, along with active social media profiles. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and trustworthy, with no adult or questionable content detected. The overall risk assessment is moderate with recommendations to improve privacy compliance by publishing policies and implementing cookie consent, enabling DNSSEC, and adding security and incident response documentation to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorYoast SEOGoogle Tag ManagerCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Fraud Blocker operates in the digital advertising technology sector, focusing on click fraud detection and prevention. Its competitive advantage lies in proprietary software that claims to improve advertising results by nearly 30%. The business model is SaaS-based, targeting advertisers and agencies using Google Ads. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for software usage. The company maintains a small team and a consistent brand presence across social media platforms. Market positioning as a leading click fraud protection provider suggests a niche specialization with potential for growth. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, but external links indicate integration with major ad and analytics platforms. Strategic observations include the need for enhanced compliance documentation and security transparency to support scaling and customer trust.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@fraudblocker.com

Phone Numbers (1)

800*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and domain registration is protected with multiple client prohibitions, reducing risk of hijacking. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, representing a missed opportunity for DNS security enhancement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a security.txt file and incident response policy indicates limited formalized security governance. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The use of third-party tracking pixels and analytics is standard but requires transparent user consent mechanisms. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from formal policies and improved DNS security. Business impact of current gaps is moderate, primarily related to compliance and trust rather than immediate technical vulnerabilities.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Fraud Blocker

Description:

Save money by blocking click fraud on Google Ads using Fraud Blocker's best-in-class fraud detection software.

Key Services:
Click fraud detectionClick fraud blockingGoogle Ads fraud protection
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorYoast SEOGoogle Tag ManagerCloudflare DNS
Frameworks:
GeneratePress themeElementor page builder
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain locked with multiple client prohibitions
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (implied via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelReddit PixelGoogle Ads Conversion Tracking
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

80/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

72/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_s00646443.autospf.email ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:79615e696a6348279c06e3f3c18b5194@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 39 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:fraudblocker.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/14/2025 (39 days)
SANs:fraudblocker.com, *.fraudblocker.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
21 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(125 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:172.66.43.97, 172.66.40.159
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3108::ac42:289f, 2606:4700:3108::ac42:2b61
Name Servers:
mario.ns.cloudflare.com
megan.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2381292309, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:40ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_s00646443.autospf.email ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the GeneratePress theme and Elementor page builder, which supports responsive design and SEO optimization. The tech stack includes Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tag management. Hosting and DNS services leverage Cloudflare for performance and security benefits. Performance is moderate with preloading and caching optimizations observed. Accessibility features are basic but functional. The site uses multiple external scripts for tracking and marketing, including Facebook and Reddit pixels, which require proper privacy management. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing formal security documentation. Opportunities exist to modernize security practices and enhance compliance to support business growth and trustworthiness.
Analyze Another Website