Skip to main content

Is freeguides.com a Scam? Security Check Results - FreeGuides Reviews

freeguides.com favicon

Is freeguides.com Safe? Security Analysis for FreeGuides

Check if freeguides.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityN/asmall
WebflowGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerMicrosoft ClarityFacebook Pixel+5 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:05:39 PM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

FreeGuides operates as a digital platform providing hotels with a comprehensive contactless guest experience through QR codes, AI-powered self-guided tours, and local recommendations. The company targets hospitality businesses aiming to enhance guest engagement and increase revenue via integrated activity bookings and promotions. The website demonstrates a professional and modern digital presence built on Webflow, leveraging multiple analytics and marketing tools to optimize user experience and business insights. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests room for compliance improvement. The lack of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, warranting further verification. Overall, FreeGuides presents as a credible small business in the hospitality technology sector with a good digital maturity level.

Detected Technologies

WebflowGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerMicrosoft ClarityFacebook PixelCrisp ChatCalendly WidgetjQueryGoogle FontsWebFont Loader

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

FreeGuides occupies a niche in the hospitality technology market, offering SaaS solutions that streamline hotel guest communication and drive ancillary revenue through partnerships with tour and activity providers. Their business model relies on commissions from bookings and upselling local experiences. The website features testimonials and customer logos, indicating established client relationships. Marketing efforts include Google and Facebook advertising, supported by tracking pixels and tag management. The company uses external forms for contact, suggesting a lean operational approach. Growth potential is supported by AI integration and expanding partner ecosystem. However, the missing WHOIS data and limited direct contact information may impact trust for some prospects.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

w*****@FreeGuides.comHomeAboutToursSign

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses reputable third-party services for analytics and chat, reducing exposure to common web vulnerabilities. No security headers were detected in the HTML, which is a recommended enhancement to mitigate risks like clickjacking and XSS. The absence of published security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness perception. No sensitive data leakage or vulnerable libraries were observed. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by implementing security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure process.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details and consent mechanisms.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

FreeGuides

Description:

FreeGuides is a digital compendium and guest QR platform that streamlines hotel operations, boosts revenue, and delivers a seamless contactless experience.

Key Services:
Digital hotel guidebookContactless guest experience via QR codesAI-powered self-guided toursIntegration with tour/activity providers for commissionsLocal recommendations and F&B promotions
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WebflowGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerMicrosoft ClarityFacebook PixelCrisp ChatCalendly WidgetjQueryGoogle FontsWebFont Loader
Frameworks:
Webflow CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure third-party analytics and chat services

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityFacebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsFacebook Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Microsoft ClarityFacebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Calendly
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:daniel@freeguides.com
Forensic Reports:daniel@freeguides.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 58 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
24 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(314 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:99.83.190.102, 75.2.70.75
Name Servers:
ns53.domaincontrol.com
ns54.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
30: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
40: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
50: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025063000, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:199ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Webflow CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and integrations including Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and Crisp Chat for user engagement and analytics. The site loads external fonts via Google Fonts and uses Calendly for scheduling. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and responsive design. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. There is no evidence of legacy or vulnerable libraries. The technical infrastructure supports a professional user experience but could benefit from improved accessibility and security header implementation.
Analyze Another Website