Skip to main content

Is frezaluks.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Frezaluks Reviews

frezaluks.lv favicon

Is frezaluks.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Frezaluks

Check if frezaluks.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingLatviasmall
WordPress 3.4.1jQuery 1.7.2Google Analytics (ga.js)SitePress Multilingual CMS (WPML)NextGEN Gallery+3 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:33:12 PM
40
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Frezaluks is a Latvian small business specializing in CNC milling, engraving, and 3D milling services primarily for sheet materials such as organic glass, aluminum, composites, plywood, and MDF. Their services target industries including advertising, construction, design, industry, and furniture manufacturing. The website is built on an older WordPress platform with multilingual support and uses a responsive theme. While the site is functional and professionally designed, it lacks modern security and privacy features, including up-to-date software versions and privacy policies. Social media presence on Twitter and Facebook supports their business outreach. Security posture is moderate but weakened by outdated software and missing security headers. Overall, the website is legitimate and consistent with a small manufacturing service provider but requires technical and security improvements to enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 3.4.1jQuery 1.7.2Google Analytics (ga.js)SitePress Multilingual CMS (WPML)NextGEN GallerySmart YouTube pluginMappress Google Maps pluginSearch Google plugin

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Frezaluks operates in a niche manufacturing sector providing CNC machining services with a focus on precision and timely delivery. Their competitive advantage lies in professional CNC equipment and experienced engineers. The business model is service-oriented with additional project design support. The company targets regional businesses in Latvia and possibly neighboring countries. The website's multilingual capability suggests an intent to reach a broader audience. The lack of detailed business registration or contact information on the site limits transparency but social media links provide some external validation. Growth potential depends on modernization of digital presence and enhanced security and privacy compliance.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the use of outdated WordPress (version 3.4.1) and jQuery (1.7.2) versions introduces significant vulnerabilities. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options further weakens defenses. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR requirements. Google Analytics is implemented but with redundant script inclusions. Incident response and security policy information are not found, suggesting limited security governance. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, requiring urgent updates and policy implementations.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Upgrade WordPress and all plugins/themes to the latest supported versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Frezaluks

Description:

Frezaluks provides CNC milling and engraving services for sheet materials including organic glass, aluminum, composite, plywood, MDF, chipboard, and others. They offer services in advertising, construction, design, industry, and furniture manufacturing sectors.

Key Services:
CNC millingEngraving3D millingProject design
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 3.4.1jQuery 1.7.2Google Analytics (ga.js)SitePress Multilingual CMS (WPML)NextGEN GallerySmart YouTube pluginMappress Google Maps pluginSearch Google plugin
Frameworks:
Responsive Theme
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
45/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS used (implied by https URLs)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a small Latvian CNC machining service provider

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.69.241 ip4:91.203.68.185 ip4:85.31.97.31 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.69.192/26 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 55 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

12 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.69.241
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025073007, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:108ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.69.241 ip4:91.203.68.185 ip4:85.31.97.31 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.69.192/26 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 3.4.1, which is significantly outdated and exposes the site to security risks. The technology stack includes jQuery 1.7.2 and several WordPress plugins such as WPML for multilingual support, NextGEN Gallery for image management, and Smart YouTube for video embedding. The responsive theme provides a good user experience on desktop but mobile optimization is basic. Performance is moderate with multiple external script calls, including redundant Google Analytics scripts. SEO is basic with canonical tags and meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, modernization of the tech stack and optimization of scripts and SEO is recommended.
Analyze Another Website