Skip to main content

Is fristar.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Fristar Reviews

fristar.lv favicon

Is fristar.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Fristar

Check if fristar.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationLatviamedium
WordPressElementorGoogle AnalyticsjQueryCookieYes cookie consent
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:44:55 PM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Fristar.lv is a Latvian-based catering service specializing in providing balanced and nutritious meals primarily for children and youth in educational and healthcare institutions. The company operates in multiple Latvian cities including Riga, Jelgava, Valmiera, and Ādažu novads, serving over 20,000 individuals daily. Recognized for quality, Fristar has received awards such as the best school caterer in Riga, highlighting its market position and commitment to nutritional standards. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and a cookie consent mechanism, though it lacks explicit privacy and terms of service pages. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor, uses Google Analytics for tracking, and enforces HTTPS, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorGoogle AnalyticsjQueryCookieYes cookie consent

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Fristar operates in the education and catering sectors, targeting schools, kindergartens, and healthcare facilities. Its business model focuses on large-scale meal preparation and delivery, emphasizing nutritional balance and local sourcing. The company’s competitive advantage lies in its recognized quality and extensive regional presence. Revenue streams likely derive from institutional contracts. The website suggests a medium-sized enterprise with a motivated workforce and a focus on customer satisfaction. The partnership with fristar.ee indicates regional expansion or sister operations. The company maintains active communication channels and promotes job vacancies, signaling growth and operational transparency.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

i*****@fristar.lv
p*****@fristar.lv

Phone Numbers (2)

+3712922****
+3712002****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly configured, and a cookie consent banner is implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. However, no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were found, which are critical for legal compliance and user trust. Security headers are not detected, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, indicating room for improvement in security best practices. No obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but should be enhanced to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Fristar

Description:

Fristar provides balanced, nutritious, and tasty meals primarily for children and youth in schools, kindergartens, and other educational and healthcare institutions in Latvia. They serve nearly 60 locations including Riga, Jelgava, Valmiera, and Ādažu novads, preparing meals for over 20,000 children, youth, and adults.

Key Services:
School and kindergarten cateringMeal preparation for healthcare institutionsRegional catering services in multiple Latvian cities
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorGoogle AnalyticsjQueryCookieYes cookie consent
Frameworks:
Elementor
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
CookieYes
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@balticrest.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc@balticrest.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 61 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:193.105.166.200
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: fristar-lv.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1713766375, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:88ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using the Elementor page builder, which provides flexibility and ease of content management. It integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking and uses CookieYes for cookie consent management. The site loads a variety of CSS and JS assets including jQuery and smartmenus for navigation. Performance appears moderate with lazy loading and responsive design features implemented. However, there is no explicit hosting provider information. The site could benefit from additional technical SEO enhancements and improved accessibility compliance. No critical technical debt or risks were identified, but security header implementation and privacy documentation are recommended.
Analyze Another Website