Is front-end.social Safe? Security Analysis for front-end.social
Check if front-end.social is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
front-end.social is a small, community-driven Mastodon instance focused on front-end web developers who value inclusivity, accessibility, and diversity. The platform offers a decentralized social media experience powered by Mastodon, emphasizing human-centered interaction over technology. The community is moderated by a team of volunteers and maintains a code of conduct to foster respectful engagement. Registrations are currently paused to ensure sustainable growth and quality of care. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including React and WebSockets, with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and manual moderation practices, though some formal security policies and cookie consent mechanisms are absent. WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is justified for this type of community platform. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and well-aligned with its niche audience.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The website occupies a niche position as a front-end focused Mastodon server, targeting web developers and enthusiasts interested in accessible and diverse online communities. Its business model is community-centric rather than commercial, relying on controlled membership and volunteer moderation. The lack of aggressive marketing or advertising aligns with its goal to remain small and sustainable. The platform leverages open-source Mastodon software, contributing to its credibility and transparency. The presence of a clear code of conduct and active moderators supports a healthy community culture. The site links to related Mastodon resources and GitHub, indicating engagement with the broader open-source ecosystem. No direct revenue streams or parent company affiliations are evident, reinforcing its grassroots nature.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
Security maturity is moderate to good. The site enforces HTTPS and uses manual moderation to manage content and behavior, which reduces risks of abuse and misinformation. However, the absence of visible security headers in the HTML and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts represent areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or terms of service page. The use of WHOIS privacy protection is appropriate for the community-focused nature of the site. Overall, the security posture supports safe user interaction but could benefit from formalized policies and transparency enhancements.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
front-end.social
Front-end web makers who value humans over technology & embrace diversity on an accessible web. We hope to stay small & grow slowly. Mascots by @stephaniewalter.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Manual moderation of content and behavior
- Use of content warnings for sensitive content
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a Mastodon instance focused on front-end web developers and community inclusivity.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration
LOWCurrent value: "0"
Weak Referrer-Policy configuration
LOWCurrent value: "same-origin"
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
Complex SPF record
LOWToo many include statements can cause lookup limits
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 79 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Weak SPF Policy
HIGHSPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings