Skip to main content

Is frujo.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - FRUJO, a.s. Reviews

F

Is frujo.cz Safe? Security Analysis for FRUJO, a.s.

Check if frujo.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingCzech Republicmedium
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsreCAPTCHAaPilot CMSLeady tracking
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:40:46 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

FRUJO, a.s. is a Czech-based manufacturer specializing in the production of food components such as fruit, vegetable, and other ingredient bases for various sectors of the food industry including dairy, bakery, and beverage industries. The company holds recognized certifications like IFS and BIO, indicating a commitment to quality and compliance. Their website is multilingual, targeting an international audience, and offers an e-commerce platform for related products. The business model focuses on supplying high-quality components to food manufacturers, supported by a professional online presence and clear contact information. Technically, the website is built on the aPilot CMS platform and integrates modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Leady tracking. It employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA for security, with a cookie consent mechanism indicating some level of privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and well-structured, providing a good user experience. From a security perspective, while HTTPS and reCAPTCHA are implemented, explicit security headers and a public security policy or incident response contacts are missing. No WHOIS data was retrievable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency but does not directly impact the legitimacy of the business as presented on the site. Overall, FRUJO presents a professional and trustworthy business front with room for improvement in security transparency and privacy policy publication. The risk level is moderate, primarily due to the lack of WHOIS data and some missing security best practices.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsreCAPTCHAaPilot CMSLeady tracking

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

FRUJO operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on food ingredient components. Their market positioning is that of an established, quality-certified supplier with a diversified product portfolio serving multiple food industry verticals. The company leverages multiple brands and subsidiaries to target niche markets such as bakery and sauces. Their revenue streams likely include direct sales through an e-shop and B2B supply contracts. The target customers are food manufacturers requiring specialized components. The website's multilingual support and certifications suggest a strategy aimed at both domestic and international markets. Partnerships with related brand domains indicate a structured brand ecosystem. Growth indicators include product innovation and a dedicated farmer product line. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining certifications and expanding digital presence.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@frujo.cz

Phone Numbers (1)

+4205193*****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate gaps in security transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. GDPR compliance is partially indicated by the cookie consent banner but lacks a clear privacy policy. Incident response readiness is not evident. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a medium-sized manufacturing business but could be enhanced by publishing security policies, adding security headers, and implementing a vulnerability disclosure program.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve privacy compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

FRUJO, a.s.

Description:

Výroba potravinářských komponentů pro různá odvětví potravinářského průmyslu. Profesionální přístup, moderní trendy a technologie, flexibilní servis.

Key Services:
Production of fruit componentsProduction of vegetable componentsEmulsions, bases, concentratesNon-fruit componentsPowder mixturesBIO productsFarmer productsE-shop for related products
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsreCAPTCHAaPilot CMSLeady tracking
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google DoubleClick
Tracking Pixels:
Leady
Marketing Tools:
Leady
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google Ads

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:88.86.101.25 ip4:213.175.36.14 ip4:213.175.39.112 ip4:213.175.39.113 ip4:213.175.39.114 ip4:213.175.39.115 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:sendgrid.net -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 89 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
25 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:88.86.101.25
Name Servers:
ns.forpsi.czDNS only
ns.forpsi.it
ns.forpsi.net
MX Records:
10: frujo-cz.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025062502, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:98ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:88.86.101.25 ip4:213.175.36.14 ip4:213.175.39.112 ip4:213.175.39.113 ip4:213.175.39.114 ip4:213.175.39.115 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:sendgrid.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the aPilot CMS platform and uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Google reCAPTCHA. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. Performance is moderate with multiple CSS and JS resources loaded asynchronously. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with more ARIA attributes and semantic HTML. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional online presence with opportunities for optimization in accessibility and security headers.
Analyze Another Website