Skip to main content

Is ft.com a Scam? Security Check Results - ft.com Reviews

F

Is ft.com Safe? Security Analysis for Client Challenge

Check if ft.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/alarge
JavaScriptCSSHTML5
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 6:49:58 AM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.ft.com is currently inaccessible beyond a security challenge page that verifies the browser before granting access. This challenge page includes minimal content such as a loading spinner and JavaScript-based verification scripts, indicating the presence of a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or similar security mechanism blocking direct content access. Due to this, no substantive business or content information is available from the provided HTML. The WHOIS lookup for the domain failed to return any registration details, which may be due to privacy protection or registry restrictions, limiting the ability to verify domain legitimacy from registration data. The site appears to be hosted on Fastly CDN, as inferred from the logo URL, and employs a Content-Security-Policy header, indicating some security best practices are in place.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptCSSHTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Given the domain www.ft.com is widely known as the Financial Times media outlet, it is a large enterprise operating in the media sector. However, the provided data does not include explicit business details, contact information, or policies. The lack of accessible content and WHOIS data restricts the ability to analyze market positioning, partnerships, or revenue streams. The security challenge page suggests a strong emphasis on protecting the site from automated or malicious traffic, which is consistent with a high-profile media company.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The presence of a Content-Security-Policy header and a browser verification challenge indicates a proactive security posture aimed at mitigating automated attacks and ensuring content integrity. However, the inability to access the full site content limits the assessment of other security controls such as SSL configuration, security headers, and vulnerability management. No incident response or security policy information is available. The WHOIS data absence reduces transparency and trust but may be justified by privacy considerations for a high-profile domain.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Provide a publicly accessible privacy policy and cookie policy to enhance privacy compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page is a security challenge verifying the browser, minimal content with loading spinner and JavaScript challenge detected

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptCSSHTML5

Security Assessment

Security Score:
25/100
Best Practices:
  • Content-Security-Policy header present

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked behind a security challenge page

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

82/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:mktomail.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:email.hivebrite.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:24982124.spf07.hubspotemail.net -all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@ft.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc@ft.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 14 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
30 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(82 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:151.101.66.46, 151.101.130.46, 151.101.2.46, 151.101.194.46
Name Servers:
ns-1447.awsdns-52.org
ns-1984.awsdns-56.co.uk
ns-52.awsdns-06.com
ns-530.awsdns-02.net
MX Records:
10: aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
30: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
30: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 60s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:144ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:mktomail.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:email.hivebrite.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:24982124.spf07.hubspotemail.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The site uses modern web technologies including JavaScript and CSS with a Content-Security-Policy header to restrict resource loading. Hosting is via Fastly CDN, which supports performance and security. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility considerations, but these cannot be fully verified due to content blocking. No CMS or frameworks are explicitly detected. The security challenge page impacts performance and user experience but serves as a protective measure. No analytics or advertising scripts were detected in the provided content.
Analyze Another Website