Skip to main content

Is fu-berlin.de a Scam? Security Check Results - Freie Universität Berlin Reviews

fu-berlin.de favicon

Is fu-berlin.de Safe? Security Analysis for Freie Universität Berlin

Check if fu-berlin.de is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationGermanylarge
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptSVG
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 8:42:06 AM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Freie Universität Berlin is a leading public university in Germany, recognized as an excellence university since 2007. It offers a broad range of academic programs across twelve faculties and three central institutes, serving a diverse audience including students, researchers, staff, and international partners. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, clear navigation, and multilingual support. Technically, it is built on a Ruby on Rails-based CMS (Infopark CMS Fiona), utilizing modern web standards such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and SVG graphics. The hosting infrastructure appears linked to academic networks, enhancing reliability and trust. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and CSRF protections, though explicit security headers and incident response policies are not evident in the provided data. Privacy compliance is strong with a comprehensive privacy policy and GDPR adherence, but cookie consent mechanisms could be improved. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-suited to its educational mission.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptSVG

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The university holds a strong market position as a top-tier German institution with a focus on excellence in research and teaching. Its business model centers on public education and research funding, supported by extensive academic offerings and international collaborations. The target audience spans prospective and current students, academic staff, researchers, and external partners. The website supports this ecosystem with detailed service portals, career resources, and international programs. Partnerships with research networks and academic institutions are evident, though no commercial subsidiaries or parent companies are identified. The university's branding is consistent and reinforces its reputation. Growth indicators include active internationalization and research funding initiatives.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is moderate to good. The presence of HTTPS and CSRF tokens indicates baseline protections. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly documented, which could hinder rapid mitigation of security incidents. Data protection officer contact is available, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, the security culture appears adequate but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce comprehensive HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options).

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Freie Universität Berlin

Description:

Die Freie Universität Berlin gehört seit 2007 zu den Exzellenzuniversitäten in Deutschland – sie ist führend in Wissenschaft und Lehre, in der Region vielfältig vernetzt und international aufgestellt. Sie bietet an zwölf Fachbereichen und drei Zentralinstituten mehr als 150 Studiengänge an.

Key Services:
Academic programsResearchInternational cooperationStudent servicesCareer services
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptSVG
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage (implied by URL)
  • CSRF token present in meta tags

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a comprehensive, well-structured university portal.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.fu-berlin.de ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 68 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

7 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:160.45.170.10
Name Servers:
atalante.stanford.edu
dns-2.dfn.de
ns1.fu-berlin.deDNS only
ns2.fu-berlin.deDNS only
ns3.fu-berlin.deDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.fu-berlin.de
SOA:Serial: 2025070401, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:115ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.fu-berlin.de ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is powered by Infopark CMS Fiona on a Ruby on Rails backend, indicating a robust and scalable platform suitable for complex academic content management. The front-end uses modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and SVG for graphics, ensuring good compatibility and visual quality. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with clear navigation and structured content. Hosting appears to leverage academic DNS servers, likely providing stable and secure infrastructure. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in asset delivery and caching. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were identified, but security header implementation and cookie management could be improved.
Analyze Another Website