Skip to main content

Is furnify.nl a Scam? Security Check Results - D/DOCK Reviews

D

Is furnify.nl Safe? Security Analysis for D/DOCK

Check if furnify.nl is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
WordPressYoast SEOGoogle AnalyticsjQueryWebToffee Cookie Consent
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 1:44:42 PM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

D/DOCK operates Furnify, a specialized sustainable interior design initiative focused on circular economy principles, founded in 2011. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear messaging about sustainability and circular design. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though additional security headers could enhance protection. The absence of WHOIS data is a minor concern but does not detract significantly from overall trust given the professional presentation and active social media presence. Privacy compliance is well addressed with GDPR-aligned policies and consent management.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEOGoogle AnalyticsjQueryWebToffee Cookie Consent

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Furnify targets environmentally conscious clients seeking sustainable interior solutions, leveraging reclaimed materials and circular design. Integrated fully into D/DOCK, it benefits from a broader design studio's resources and reputation. The business model centers on consulting and design services with a niche focus on circularity. The company maintains a moderate digital footprint with social media engagement and a professional website. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are listed on the Furnify page, but contact forms and social links facilitate communication. The lack of public WHOIS data suggests privacy protection or limited domain transparency.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent tools compliant with GDPR, indicating a mature privacy approach. No security headers were detected in the HTML content, suggesting room for improvement in defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found. The site lacks a published security policy or incident response contacts, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional headers and a vulnerability disclosure mechanism.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen site security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

D/DOCK

Description:

Furnify was founded by D/DOCK in 2011 as a pioneering team dedicated to sustainable and circular interior design. Furnify focuses on consulting, designing, and realizing interiors using reclaimed furniture and materials, promoting circular economy principles. Furnify is now fully integrated into D/DOCK to expand its circular impact.

Key Services:
Interior consultingSustainable designCircular economy solutionsReclaimed furniture sourcing and design
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEOGoogle AnalyticsjQueryWebToffee Cookie Consent
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

95/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a include:spf.spamservice.nl include:servers.mcsv.net include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.exclaimer.net ip4:83.217.70.243 ip4:176.62.168.242 ~all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector2(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:83.217.70.243
Name Servers:
ns1.european-server.euDNS only
ns3.european-server.comDNS only
ns4.european-server.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: ddock-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1743175841, TTL: 40000s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:99ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a include:spf.spamservice.nl include:servers.mcsv.net include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.exclaimer.net ip4:83.217.70.243 ip4:176.62.168.242 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin and uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking. It employs WebToffee Cookie Consent for GDPR compliance. The site loads jQuery and custom JavaScript for UI interactions. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. No hosting provider details were found. The site is well-structured with clear navigation and responsive design, but lacks advanced security headers and some accessibility enhancements.
Analyze Another Website