Skip to main content

Is fusewallet.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Fuse Reviews

fusewallet.com favicon

Is fusewallet.com Safe? Security Analysis for Fuse

Check if fusewallet.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/asmall
Framer (website builder)Montserrat fontInter fontFragment Mono fontApple Touch Icon+2 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 4:14:00 AM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Fusewallet.com is a fintech website offering a personal finance app powered by stablecoin rails, enabling users to manage cash, earn yield, spend via Fuse Card, and trade Solana assets. The business targets individuals seeking modern alternatives to traditional banking, positioning itself as an innovative player in the cryptocurrency and personal finance space. The website is built using the Framer platform, hosted on AWS infrastructure, and employs modern web fonts and SEO best practices. However, it lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as explicit contact information, which impacts compliance and trust. Security posture is basic with no detected security headers or incident response disclosures, and DNSSEC is not enabled on the domain. The domain registration is consistent with the business age and shows no privacy protection, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and professionally designed but requires improvements in privacy, security, and contact transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

Framer (website builder)Montserrat fontInter fontFragment Mono fontApple Touch IconOpen GraphTwitter Cards

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Fuse operates in the finance sector with a focus on personal finance and cryptocurrency management. Its business model revolves around providing a fintech app that integrates stablecoins and Solana asset trading, appealing to tech-savvy users and crypto enthusiasts. The company was founded in 2019, aligning with the domain registration date. The market positioning is that of a challenger fintech app offering banking alternatives. No partnerships or subsidiaries are disclosed on the site. The lack of explicit business contact details and compliance documentation suggests room for maturity in governance and customer trust. The website content is relevant and targeted, but the absence of certifications or trust signals limits competitive advantage in regulated markets.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security, which are recommended for enhanced protection. DNSSEC is not enabled, representing a minor DNS security gap. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, and no incident response contacts are provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, which reduces privacy risks but also limits marketing insights. Overall, the security posture is basic and would benefit from implementing standard security best practices and compliance documentation to reduce risk and build user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Fuse

Description:

Fuse is the personal finance app powered by stablecoin rails. Manage your cash, earn yield, spend with Fuse Card, and trade Solana assets. It's not a bank, it's what you wanted your bank to be.

Key Services:
cash managementyield earningFuse Card spendingSolana asset trading
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Framer (website builder)Montserrat fontInter fontFragment Mono fontApple Touch IconOpen GraphTwitter Cards
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website uses modern web fonts and Framer platform for design.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

DMARC Partial Enforcement

LOW

DMARC only applies to 20% of messages

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject(20% enforcement)
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@fusewallet.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 41 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(250 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:52.223.52.2, 35.71.142.77
Name Servers:
ns-1052.awsdns-03.org
ns-1734.awsdns-24.co.uk
ns-346.awsdns-43.com
ns-891.awsdns-47.net
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:71ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Framer platform, leveraging modern web fonts (Montserrat, Inter, Fragment Mono) and hosted on AWS infrastructure as indicated by the nameservers. The site includes proper meta tags for SEO and social media sharing (Open Graph and Twitter Cards). Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. No CMS other than Framer is detected. The site lacks analytics and advertising scripts, which may limit marketing effectiveness but improves privacy. The technical stack is modern but could be enhanced with additional security configurations and compliance features to reduce technical debt and improve operational resilience.
Analyze Another Website