Skip to main content

Is futures2050.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - futures2050.lv Reviews

F

Is futures2050.lv Safe? Security Analysis for futures2050.lv

Check if futures2050.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
HTML5JavaScriptGoogle Adsense Domains CAFCloudfront CDNGoogle Ads+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:19:12 PM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website futures2050.lv is a parked domain page primarily serving as a placeholder for domain resale. It lacks substantive business content, contact information, or clear branding. The site is heavily monetized through advertising networks such as Google Adsense Domains CAF and Youseasky, with multiple tracking scripts embedded. Technically, the site uses basic HTML and JavaScript with Amazon Cloudfront CDN for content delivery but lacks modern security practices such as HTTPS enforcement and security headers. Privacy compliance is minimal, with only a basic privacy policy page in Finnish and no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site presents a low trust profile with limited business credibility and poor user experience.

Detected Technologies

HTML5JavaScriptGoogle Adsense Domains CAFCloudfront CDNGoogle AdsXMLHttpRequest

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The domain appears to be held for resale, with no active business operations or services presented. There is no identifiable company or organizational information, no contact details, and no social media presence. The business model is domain parking monetized by advertising. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits and absence of registrant details further obscure legitimacy. The target audience is general internet users who may be interested in purchasing the domain. There are no indicators of partnerships or subsidiaries. The site does not demonstrate competitive positioning or growth indicators.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security posture is weak. The site does not enforce HTTPS, lacks security headers, and exposes no secure forms or inputs. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security certifications. Tracking scripts and advertising networks are present but without transparency or user consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data and registrant information limits trust. No malware or phishing indicators were detected, but the overall security hygiene is poor, increasing risk for users interacting with the site.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Tämä verkkotunnus saattaa olla myytävänä!

Key Services:
domain parkingdomain resale
Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5JavaScriptGoogle Adsense Domains CAFCloudfront CDNGoogle AdsXMLHttpRequest
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Adsense Domains CAFGoogle AdsYouseasky
Tracking Pixels:
Google Ads trackingYouseasky tracking
Marketing Tools:
Google AdsYouseasky
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is a parked domain page with minimal content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

72/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip6:fd1b:212c:a5f9::/48 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 42 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:185.53.177.50
Name Servers:
ns1.parkingcrew.netDNS only
ns2.parkingcrew.netDNS only
MX Records:
5: mail.h-email.net
1: alltheemails.com
SOA:Serial: 1753917000, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:502ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip6:fd1b:212c:a5f9::/48 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a simple HTML structure with inline CSS and JavaScript. It leverages Amazon Cloudfront CDN for asset delivery and integrates Google Adsense Domains CAF and Youseasky for advertising and tracking. No modern CMS or frameworks are detected. The site is moderately optimized for mobile but lacks accessibility features and SEO best practices. Performance is moderate but could be improved by reducing external script dependencies. The absence of HTTPS and security headers is a significant technical deficiency. Overall, the technical implementation is basic and suitable only for domain parking purposes.
Analyze Another Website