
Is fuxichang.com Safe? Security Analysis for 富硒食品、保健产品品牌知识分享平台 -硒宝网
Check if fuxichang.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

AI Summary
The website www.fuxichang.com operates as a Chinese-language content platform dedicated to sharing knowledge and articles about selenium-enriched foods and health supplements. It targets consumers interested in health and nutrition, particularly related to selenium products. The site positions itself as a niche informational resource rather than a commercial storefront, focusing on educational content and brand knowledge dissemination. Technically, the site is built on WordPress and employs common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js, with analytics integration via Baidu and Zhanzhanyun. The site is mobile-optimized and presents a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are recommended for compliance and enhanced protection. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of WHOIS registration data introduces some uncertainty regarding domain legitimacy, although the presence of a Chinese ICP license suggests regulatory compliance within China. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate security posture and basic privacy compliance. The risk assessment indicates moderate trustworthiness with recommendations to improve security headers, implement cookie consent, and publish terms of service. The domain registration status should be clarified to enhance credibility. The website content is safe for general audiences with no adult or explicit material detected.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The platform serves a specialized market segment focused on selenium-enriched foods and health supplements, leveraging content marketing to attract a health-conscious audience. Its business model revolves around knowledge sharing rather than direct sales, potentially monetizing through partnerships or advertising. The site links to multiple related domains, indicating a network of partner sites in agriculture, health, and related sectors. Growth indicators include frequent content updates and a consistent brand presence. However, the lack of explicit business contact information and unclear domain registration status may limit trust and partnership opportunities. Strategic focus on transparency and compliance could enhance market positioning.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website exhibits a basic security maturity level with HTTPS enabled but missing key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. No incident response or security policy pages are present, and no dedicated contact channels for security issues were found. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. The use of outdated jQuery version 1.12.4 may pose potential vulnerabilities if not regularly patched. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an informational site but requires improvements to meet higher compliance standards and reduce risk exposure.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
硒宝网是一家分享转发富硒食品及品牌保健品文章及知识的网站。
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- No visible exposed sensitive data
- No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
No email authentication configured
CRITICALDomain is vulnerable to email spoofing
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 84 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM7 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Certificate Details
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled
MEDIUMDomain can be transferred without authorization
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
Domain Registration Details
- •No domain protection locks enabled
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings