Skip to main content

Is fxbclimateadvocates.org a Scam? Security Check Results - FXB Climate Reviews

fxbclimateadvocates.org favicon

Is fxbclimateadvocates.org Safe? Security Analysis for FXB Climate

https://fxbclimateadvocates.org

Check if fxbclimateadvocates.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitN/asmall
Wix.com Website BuilderJavaScriptCSSHTML5
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 8:32:11 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

FXB Climate Advocates is a small, youth-focused non-profit organization dedicated to climate activism and environmental protection. Their website, built on the Wix platform, presents a professional and consistent brand image targeting young climate activists. The site provides information about their mission and encourages engagement but lacks explicit contact details and formal privacy or cookie policies. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies with HTTPS enforced, but it lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data due to privacy protection limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy. Overall, the website is safe and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security features to improve trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

Wix.com Website BuilderJavaScriptCSSHTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The organization operates in the non-profit sector focusing on youth climate advocacy. Their market position is niche, targeting environmentally conscious young individuals. The business model revolves around awareness, activism, and community engagement rather than commercial transactions. The website does not reveal revenue streams or partnerships explicitly. The lack of detailed business information and contact data suggests a small-scale operation. The use of Wix indicates a cost-effective digital presence. Growth indicators and partnerships are not evident from the website content.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No signs of vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Incident response and security contact information are not provided, limiting transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with user consent mechanisms.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

FXB Climate

Description:

FXB Climate Advocates is a diverse group of young climate activists committed to protecting our planet. Together, we can change our future. Get to know our work and find out how you can make a difference.

Key Services:
Climate activismYouth advocacyEnvironmental awareness
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Wix.com Website BuilderJavaScriptCSSHTML5
Platforms:
Wix
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and styles.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=86400"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 30 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(212 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:185.230.63.186, 185.230.63.171, 185.230.63.107
Name Servers:
ns8.wixdns.net
ns9.wixdns.net
SOA:Serial: 2020050419, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:71ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is hosted on Wix, leveraging their platform and content delivery network. It uses standard Wix JavaScript bundles and CSS for styling. The site is mobile optimized and loads with moderate performance. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but could be enhanced. Accessibility features are minimal but present. No custom backend or advanced frameworks detected. The technical setup is typical for small non-profit websites using website builders, with limited customization and security hardening.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about fxbclimateadvocates.org

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website