Skip to main content

Is g2.com a Scam? Security Check Results - g2.com Reviews

G

Is g2.com Safe? Security Analysis for g2.com

Check if g2.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/a
Cloudflare captcha-delivery.com
Analyzed 9/4/2025Completed 4:38:16 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.g2.com is currently inaccessible due to a security challenge page employing captcha verification, likely as part of a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or bot mitigation system. This prevents extraction of meaningful content, metadata, or business information. The WHOIS lookup failed to return any registration data, which is unusual for a well-known commercial domain and raises concerns about domain registration transparency. Technically, the site uses captcha-delivery.com services to block automated access, indicating a strong security posture against bots but limiting external analysis. Due to the lack of accessible content and metadata, no detailed business or security posture assessment can be performed. The overall risk assessment is elevated due to the inability to verify domain legitimacy and content authenticity.

Detected Technologies

Cloudflare captcha-delivery.com

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence data could be extracted due to the blocked content and missing WHOIS information. The domain is known publicly as a software review platform, but this could not be confirmed from the provided data. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified. The lack of accessible contact or policy information limits assessment of business credibility and compliance.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The presence of a captcha challenge indicates an active security mechanism to prevent automated abuse. However, no security headers or SSL configuration details were available for review. The absence of WHOIS data and domain registration details limits trust in domain legitimacy. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information was found. Overall, the security posture appears focused on access control but lacks transparency and publicly available security documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Provide publicly accessible WHOIS registration data or use a reputable registrar with transparent records.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page content is a security challenge with captcha from captcha-delivery.com and iframe sandboxing, indicating WAF or bot mitigation blocking access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Cloudflare captcha-delivery.com

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is fully blocked by a security challenge (captcha) preventing access to actual content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score
No issues found

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score
No issues found

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

50/100
Score
No issues found

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

87/100
Score

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:g2_com._es.easydmarc.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:6ec7a79604@rua.easydmarc.us
Forensic Reports:6ec7a79604@ruf.easydmarc.us

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score
Analysis failed - content could not be retrieved

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DNS Records

A Records:104.16.187.41, 104.16.188.41, 104.16.189.41, 104.16.190.41, 104.16.186.41
AAAA Records:2606:4700::6810:bc29, 2606:4700::6810:bb29, 2606:4700::6810:bd29, 2606:4700::6810:ba29, 2606:4700::6810:be29
Name Servers:
dale.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
lia.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382402224, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:55ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:g2_com._es.easydmarc.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website employs a captcha service from captcha-delivery.com embedded via iframes and scripts, indicating a strong bot mitigation strategy. No CMS or other frameworks were detectable from the minimal HTML. The site is likely behind a WAF or similar security layer that blocks automated or suspicious traffic. Performance, SEO, and accessibility cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The technical stack is minimal and focused on security blocking rather than content delivery.
Analyze Another Website