Skip to main content

Is gaianet.ai a Scam? Security Check Results - gaianet.ai Reviews

gaianet.ai favicon

Is gaianet.ai Safe? Security Analysis for Application error: a client-side exception has occurred

Check if gaianet.ai is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
ReactNext.jsGoogle Tag ManagerTwitter Universal Website Tag
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 2:43:27 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.gaianet.ai is intended to represent Gaia, a technology platform focused on building an active, intelligent ecosystem for knowledge evolution. However, the site currently suffers from a client-side application error that prevents normal content display, severely limiting user experience and content accessibility. The business appears to target developers and contributors interested in knowledge networks and AI-driven ecosystems, but no detailed company information or contact data is available on the site. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, with integration of Google Tag Manager and Twitter tracking scripts, indicating some level of digital maturity. However, the broken state of the site and lack of security headers or SSL details reduce confidence in its technical robustness. Security posture is weak due to missing security policies, absence of vulnerability disclosure, and no visible incident response contacts. The WHOIS data is malformed and provides no registrant information, which combined with the minimal site content, lowers trust and legitimacy scores. Overall, the site requires significant remediation to restore functionality, improve transparency, and enhance security and privacy compliance.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsGoogle Tag ManagerTwitter Universal Website Tag

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Gaia appears to operate in the technology sector, focusing on AI and knowledge ecosystems. The business model likely revolves around enabling users to create and contribute to knowledge nodes and domains, fostering an evolving network of information. The lack of visible business details, contact information, or certifications limits the ability to assess market positioning or competitive advantages. The presence of tracking and marketing scripts suggests an intent to engage users and grow the platform. However, the current site error and lack of policies may hinder user trust and adoption. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the available data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity of the website is low. The absence of HTTPS confirmation, security headers, and public security policies indicates a weak security posture. The visible client-side error could expose internal application details, increasing risk. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency and preparedness. GDPR compliance indicators are missing, and cookie consent is present but without linked privacy documentation. Overall, the site does not demonstrate adherence to common security best practices, posing potential risks to users and the business.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Fix the client-side application error immediately to restore website functionality and user access.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Gaia is building an active, intelligent ecosystem that supports applications that learn, improve and grow over time.

Key Services:
knowledge base nodesdomain contributionintelligent ecosystem support
Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsGoogle Tag ManagerTwitter Universal Website Tag
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Twitter Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Twitter Universal Website Tag
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is currently showing a client-side application error preventing normal content display

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:242143704.spf04.hubspotemail.net -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dev@gaianet.ai

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(168 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:3.174.113.28, 3.174.113.91, 3.174.113.124, 3.174.113.21
Name Servers:
ns-1145.awsdns-15.org
ns-1854.awsdns-39.co.uk
ns-400.awsdns-50.com
ns-862.awsdns-43.net
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:86ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:242143704.spf04.hubspotemail.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks, specifically Next.js and React, indicating a contemporary tech stack. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Twitter tracking scripts for analytics and marketing. However, the site currently suffers from a client-side exception that prevents content rendering, severely impacting user experience and SEO. No CMS or hosting provider details are discernible. Performance is moderate but cannot be fully assessed due to the error state. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but limited by the broken UI. The lack of security headers and SSL configuration details suggests technical debt in security implementation. Overall, the site requires urgent technical fixes and security enhancements to meet modern standards.
Analyze Another Website