Is galanta.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Авторизация
Check if galanta.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The website galanta.lv is primarily a login portal built on the 1C-Bitrix CMS platform, featuring a Russian language interface focused on user authentication via multiple social login providers. The site lacks publicly accessible business information, privacy policies, or contact details, limiting insight into the company's operations or market positioning. The technical infrastructure is basic, with no visible advanced analytics or advertising integrations. Security posture is weak due to absence of HTTPS confirmation and missing security headers, and the site exposes session identifiers in hidden form fields, which could pose risks. Overall, the site appears to serve as an access point rather than a public-facing business site, which constrains comprehensive analysis.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Due to the absence of business descriptions, contact information, or corporate identifiers, the business intelligence on galanta.lv is minimal. The site does not disclose company name, sector, or market position. The use of 1C-Bitrix suggests a regional or niche business possibly targeting Russian-speaking users. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as no visible certifications or trust signals, indicates limited maturity in compliance and customer engagement. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identifiable from the site content.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The security posture of galanta.lv is currently weak. The site lacks visible HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which are critical for protecting user data during authentication. The login forms use POST methods but include session IDs in hidden fields, potentially exposing session fixation vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further indicates compliance gaps. No WAF or bot protection mechanisms are detected, increasing risk of automated attacks. Overall, the site requires significant improvements to meet standard security best practices.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
poor
moderate
Technical Stack
moderate
basic
basic
poor
Security Assessment
- Secure form inputs with POST method
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a login/authentication page with no public business content.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 82 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings