Skip to main content

Is galaxy.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Galaxy Reviews

G

Is galaxy.com Safe? Security Analysis for Galaxy

Check if galaxy.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/alarge
HubSpotCookiebotGoogle Tag ManagerHotjarGoogle Analytics+3 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 2:03:07 AM
72
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Galaxy is a global leader specializing in institutional digital assets and AI infrastructure, serving a diverse clientele including institutions, startups, protocols, and investors. The company positions itself prominently in the crypto economy, offering access and services related to digital assets and blockchain technologies. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, comprehensive content, and a clear focus on its target audience. Technically, the site leverages modern marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot, Cookiebot, Google Analytics, and Hotjar, indicating a high level of digital maturity and commitment to user experience and compliance. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration transparency, although the website content and branding suggest a legitimate and established business. Overall, Galaxy demonstrates a strong market position and digital infrastructure but should enhance transparency and security disclosures to improve trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

HubSpotCookiebotGoogle Tag ManagerHotjarGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelAdRollReddit Ads Pixel

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Galaxy operates in the technology and finance sectors, focusing on digital assets and AI infrastructure. Its business model targets institutional clients and investors, providing asset management and infrastructure services in the crypto economy. The company leverages partnerships with major analytics and marketing platforms to optimize outreach and compliance. While the website lacks explicit contact details and security policies, it maintains a consistent brand image and professional content quality. The lack of WHOIS data is a notable gap, potentially indicating privacy protection or recent registration. The company appears to be large in size with a global reach, though specific founding dates and parent or subsidiary relationships are not disclosed.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and a robust cookie consent mechanism in place, reflecting GDPR compliance efforts. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security score. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact information limits transparency and readiness perception. Implementing a vulnerability disclosure program and publishing security policies would strengthen the security culture and compliance posture.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Galaxy

Description:

Galaxy, a global leader in digital assets and AI infrastructure, serves institutions, startups, protocols, and investors. Gain access to the crypto economy.

Key Services:
Digital asset managementAI infrastructureCrypto economy access
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HubSpotCookiebotGoogle Tag ManagerHotjarGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelAdRollReddit Ads Pixel
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsHotjarHubSpot
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
AdRollFacebook AdsReddit Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelHotjarHubSpot
Marketing Tools:
HubSpotCookiebot
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:us._netblocks.mimecast.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:aspmx.pardot.com include:23382424.spf01.hubspotemail.net include:amazonses.com include:sendgrid.net -all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:7b97eabf@inbox.ondmarc.com
Forensic Reports:7b97eabf@inbox.ondmarc.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 44 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:galaxy.com
Issuer:E5
Valid Until:10/20/2025 (44 days)
SANs:*.galaxy.com, galaxy.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
26 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(484 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.18.19.236, 104.18.18.236
AAAA Records:2606:4700::6812:13ec, 2606:4700::6812:12ec
Name Servers:
aiden.ns.cloudflare.com
robin.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: us-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com
10: us-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.com
SOA:Serial: 2382500528, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:43ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:us._netblocks.mimecast.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:aspmx.pardot.com include:23382424.spf01.hubspotemail.net include:amazonses.com include:sendgrid.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern technology stack with HubSpot for marketing automation, Cookiebot for cookie consent management, Google Tag Manager for tag management, and analytics tools like Google Analytics and Hotjar for user behavior insights. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured content. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site shows no signs of technical debt or performance bottlenecks. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and increase transparency around domain registration and security policies.
Analyze Another Website