Skip to main content

Is gallifordtry.co.uk a Scam? Security Check Results - Galliford Try Reviews

gallifordtry.co.uk favicon

Is gallifordtry.co.uk Safe? Security Analysis for Galliford Try

Check if gallifordtry.co.uk is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherUnited Kingdomlarge
Google Tag ManagerjQuery 3.7.0CookieYes cookie consent
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 5:06:28 PM
71
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Galliford Try is a leading UK construction group focused on improving the built environment and delivering lasting change. The website reflects a professional corporate presence with clear branding and a focus on construction services. The technical infrastructure includes modern tracking and consent management tools such as Google Tag Manager and CookieYes, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS usage implied, but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy policies, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the website is functional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerjQuery 3.7.0CookieYes cookie consent

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Galliford Try positions itself as a major player in the UK construction sector, targeting industry stakeholders and clients. The business model revolves around construction and infrastructure development, with a large organizational size implied. The website content is relevant and professionally presented, supporting the company's market position. However, the absence of detailed WHOIS data and contact information limits external verification. The company uses standard marketing and compliance tools, but lacks visible certifications or detailed business disclosures on the homepage.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and integrates cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting awareness of privacy and security requirements. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The lack of explicit security policies or incident response contacts suggests room for maturity in security governance. Regular security audits and policy publication are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Galliford Try

Description:

Galliford Try is one of the UK's leading construction groups, working to improve the UK’s built environment and delivering lasting change.

Key Services:
ConstructionInfrastructure developmentBuilt environment improvement
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerjQuery 3.7.0CookieYes cookie consent
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL)

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
CookieYes
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and fully functional with rich content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

88/100
Score

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx ip4:82.196.238.94 ip4:147.154.128.0/19 ip4:160.34.31.19 ip4:144.21.67.91 ip4:144.21.70.106 a:b.spf.service-now.com a:c.spf.service-now.com a:d.spf.service-now.com include:_spf.atoracle.com include:spf_c.oraclecloud.com include:spf.protection.out look.com include:amazonses.com -all
DNS Lookups:8/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:infosec.monitoring@gallifordtry.co.uk

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
24 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(367 days)
Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:18.202.112.132
Name Servers:
ns37.domaincontrol.comDNS only
ns38.domaincontrol.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: gallifordtry-co-uk.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025072400, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:90ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx ip4:82.196.238.94 ip4:147.154.128.0/19 ip4:160.34.31.19 ip4:144.21.67.91 ip4:144.21.70.106 a:b.spf.service-now.com a:c.spf.service-now.com a:d.spf.service-now.com include:_spf.atoracle.com include:spf_c.oraclecloud.com include:spf.protection.out look.com include:amazonses.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery 3.7.0 and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. CookieYes is used for cookie consent management, indicating GDPR compliance efforts. The HTML structure is well-formed with appropriate meta tags for SEO and social media sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading. Mobile optimization appears good based on viewport settings and responsive design elements. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site would benefit from improved accessibility features and security header implementation.
Analyze Another Website