Is galvanovna.com Safe? Security Analysis for Galvanovna RAVAK a.s.
Check if galvanovna.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Galvanovna RAVAK a.s. is a Czech Republic-based manufacturing entity specializing in galvanic surface treatments such as nickel plating, zinc plating, chromating, and anodizing aluminum. The company operates as part of the larger RAVAK a.s. group and targets industrial clients requiring decorative and protective metal surface finishes. The website content is professionally presented in Czech and outlines detailed service offerings, indicating a focused B2B manufacturing service model. Technically, the site uses an older CMS (Topinfo CMS) and relies on legacy JavaScript libraries, with Google Analytics and Tag Manager integrated for user tracking. While the site is accessible and includes a cookie consent mechanism, it lacks visible privacy and terms of service pages, which impacts compliance posture. Security-wise, the absence of updated libraries and missing security headers are notable weaknesses. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite the professional appearance and clear association with RAVAK a.s. Overall, the site presents a moderate risk profile with room for improvement in security and compliance.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The company is positioned as a specialized galvanic surface treatment provider within the manufacturing sector, serving industrial clients primarily in the Czech Republic. Its affiliation with RAVAK a.s. suggests a stable market position and access to established manufacturing infrastructure. The business model focuses on providing value-added metal finishing services, which are critical for product durability and aesthetics. The website's lack of direct contact information and limited digital presence may constrain lead generation and customer engagement. The use of legacy technology indicates potential technical debt, which could affect scalability and security. The partnership ecosystem is limited to the parent company, with no visible subsidiaries or partners. Strategic growth could benefit from enhanced digital marketing, updated technology stack, and improved compliance documentation.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS implied but not explicitly confirmed in the data. The presence of a cookie consent banner indicates some awareness of privacy regulations. However, the use of outdated JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.12.4 introduces known vulnerabilities that could be exploited. The absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is available, suggesting limited transparency and preparedness. The missing WHOIS data further complicates trust assessment. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with critical improvements needed in library updates, header implementation, and policy publication to reduce risk and enhance compliance.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Update all JavaScript libraries and dependencies to their latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Galvanovna RAVAK a.s.
Galvanovna RAVAK a.s. provádí povrchovou úpravu kovů, galvanické pokovení, zinkování s pasivací chromátem, niklování, moření a pasivace hliníku, odmašťování, eloxování a závěsné pokovování.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
basic
basic
good
Security Assessment
- Cookie consent opt-in mechanism implemented
- No visible exposed sensitive data
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google Analytics, Cloudflare
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
No email authentication configured
CRITICALDomain is vulnerable to email spoofing
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 77 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled
MEDIUMDomain can be transferred without authorization
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
Domain Registration Details
- •No domain protection locks enabled
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings