Skip to main content

Is galxe.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Galxe Reviews

galxe.com favicon

Is galxe.com Safe? Security Analysis for Galxe

Check if galxe.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
Google AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityFramer (CMS/website builder)
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:51:24 PM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Galxe operates as a Web3 growth platform offering analytics, automation, and engagement solutions tailored for blockchain projects and crypto communities. The website presents a professional and modern design built on the Framer platform, integrating advanced analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity to monitor user engagement and behavior. Despite the polished front-end and clear business focus, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about the domain's legitimacy and ownership transparency. The lack of visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies further indicates gaps in compliance and user trust mechanisms. Security-wise, the site benefits from HTTPS and basic best practices but lacks advanced security headers and formal incident response contacts, which could be improved to enhance resilience and trust. Overall, while the platform appears functional and targeted at a specialized audience, the missing domain registration details and compliance documentation suggest a moderate risk profile requiring attention.

Detected Technologies

Google AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityFramer (CMS/website builder)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Galxe positions itself as a leading Web3 growth engine, targeting blockchain developers and crypto projects seeking to leverage analytics and automation for community engagement. The business model is platform-based, likely generating revenue through SaaS subscriptions or service fees. The company appears medium-sized with consistent branding and a clear market niche in the emerging Web3 ecosystem. However, the lack of explicit company registration or contact details limits the ability to fully assess its operational scale and partnerships. The integration of modern marketing and tracking tools suggests a growth-oriented strategy with an emphasis on data-driven decision-making. Strategic observations include the need for enhanced transparency and compliance to solidify market trust and support expansion.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and usage of reputable analytics platforms. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are essential to mitigate common web vulnerabilities like XSS and clickjacking. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure policies or security.txt files was found, indicating limited formal security governance. The absence of contact channels for incident response or abuse reporting further weakens the security maturity. While no immediate vulnerabilities were detected in the provided content, the missing WHOIS data and lack of compliance documentation highlight potential risks in legitimacy and accountability. Enhancing security best practices and establishing clear incident response mechanisms are recommended to improve the overall security posture.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Galxe

Description:

Galxe is an industry-leading web3 growth platform powered by analytics, automation, and engagement solutions.

Key Services:
analyticsautomationengagement solutions
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityFramer (CMS/website builder)
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsMicrosoft Clarity
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing Tools:
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.zoho.com include:transmail.net include:amazonses.com -all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1384-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:re+62077fcb234a@inbound.dmarcdigests.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

47/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 49 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
16 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(2735 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:34.149.3.84
Name Servers:
ns-1305.awsdns-35.org
ns-1740.awsdns-25.co.uk
ns-382.awsdns-47.com
ns-608.awsdns-12.net
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:62ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.zoho.com include:transmail.net include:amazonses.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Framer, a modern web design and CMS platform, and integrates Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity for user behavior tracking. The site uses asynchronous loading of scripts to optimize performance and includes responsive design elements for mobile optimization. However, the absence of detailed hosting provider information and security headers suggests room for technical improvements. The site’s SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data, enhancing social media sharing and search engine visibility. Accessibility features appear basic but functional. Performance is moderate, with potential gains achievable through further optimization of assets and security configurations. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals but requires enhancements in security and compliance to reduce operational risks.
Analyze Another Website