Is gardenpearls.eu Safe? Security Analysis for Garden Pearls
Check if gardenpearls.eu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Garden Pearls is a small tourism promotion website highlighting 76 beautiful gardens and parks located in Estonia and Latvia. The site provides visitors with maps, event calendars, and gardener recommendations to enhance tourism experiences in the region. The business model focuses on regional tourism promotion, targeting general audiences interested in nature and garden visits. The website was first published in 2019 and uses WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO plugins to manage content and SEO optimization. The technical infrastructure is modern and includes responsive design and basic accessibility features, though performance is moderate. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks advanced security headers and privacy policies. The absence of contact information and privacy compliance documents limits business credibility and user trust. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and serves its niche well but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security practices.
Detected Technologies
š§ AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Garden Pearls occupies a niche market segment promoting garden and park tourism in Estonia and Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in curated content and event information tailored to garden enthusiasts and tourists. The business model is informational and promotional, likely supported by regional tourism funding or partnerships. The target customer segment includes tourists, gardeners, and nature lovers. Growth indicators are not explicit but the use of modern CMS and SEO tools suggests ongoing content development. The partnership ecosystem is not visible from the site, and no direct payment or e-commerce services are offered. Strategic observations include the need for improved contact transparency and privacy compliance to enhance trust and potential partnerships.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces protection against common web attacks. No sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. Incident response and security contact information are absent, limiting readiness for security events. The presence of an unconfigured Google Analytics plugin indicates potential data collection without user consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires improvements in headers, privacy compliance, and transparency to meet best practices.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
āØObservations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Garden Pearls
GARDEN PEARLS are 76 most beautiful gardens and parks in Estonia and Latvia. Come visit us!
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- No visible vulnerable libraries
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a WordPress site using Elementor and Yoast SEO.
š”ļøSecurity Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
š¤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
š”ļøNIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
š§Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
No email authentication configured
CRITICALDomain is vulnerable to email spoofing
šSSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 44 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
šDNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
ā”Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
š§Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings