Skip to main content

Is garnetstone.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Garnetstone Legal Reviews

garnetstone.lv favicon

Is garnetstone.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Garnetstone Legal

Check if garnetstone.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
Tilda CMSJavaScriptCSSHTML5
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:04:01 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Garnetstone is a small law firm specializing in providing legal support to innovation-driven companies. The website presents a professional image with clear branding and a focused business description emphasizing support for innovative businesses. The technical infrastructure is based on the Tilda CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies and CDN hosting, resulting in moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and visible privacy compliance mechanisms such as cookie consent banners. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy, though the website content and presentation suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the security posture is basic, with room for improvement in privacy and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

Tilda CMSJavaScriptCSSHTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company positions itself as a niche legal service provider targeting innovation-driven companies, likely startups and technology firms in Latvia. The business model revolves around specialized legal consulting and support services. The website content is concise and professional, but lacks detailed contact information and comprehensive legal policies, which could impact client trust. The firm appears to be small in size with no visible subsidiaries or parent company. The use of Tilda CMS suggests a focus on ease of content management and cost-effective web presence. There is no evidence of partnerships or extended service ecosystems from the website content.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs) but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security. No forms with sensitive data collection were detected, reducing immediate risk exposure. Privacy policy is present but cookie policy and incident response contacts are missing. No vulnerability disclosures or security certifications are visible. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency. Overall, the security posture is basic and would benefit from enhanced security headers, cookie consent mechanisms, and published incident response contacts to improve compliance and trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Garnetstone Legal

Description:

A law firm built to support innovation-driven companies

Key Services:
Legal support for innovation-driven companies
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Tilda CMSJavaScriptCSSHTML5
Platforms:
Tilda
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Tilda Stats
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Tilda Stats
Marketing Tools:
Tilda Stats
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a professionally designed law firm site focused on innovation-driven companies.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 redirect=_spf.yandex.net
DNS Lookups:0/10

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 25 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:185.215.4.74
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.yandex.net
SOA:Serial: 1636291048, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:72ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 redirect=_spf.yandex.net

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, utilizing standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. It uses Tilda's CDN for hosting static assets, which supports moderate performance and good mobile responsiveness. The site includes basic SEO meta tags and Open Graph tags for social sharing. Accessibility features are basic but present, such as skip links. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies. The site could improve performance and security by optimizing resource loading and implementing security best practices. The lack of visible security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and privacy implementation.
Analyze Another Website