Skip to main content

Is gashawk.io a Scam? Security Check Results - GasHawk Reviews

gashawk.io favicon

Is gashawk.io Safe? Security Analysis for GasHawk

Check if gashawk.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Framer (site generator)JavaScript modulesGoogle Fonts (Poppins, Inter)
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 6:44:31 AM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

GasHawk is a technology-focused company providing blockchain users and enterprises with tools to optimize gas fees and enhance on-chain security. The website presents a professional and modern design built using Framer, targeting blockchain developers and enterprises seeking efficiency and security in their on-chain activities. The platform offers services such as gas savings analysis and enterprise blockchain solutions, positioning itself as an emerging player in the blockchain technology sector. Technically, the website leverages modern JavaScript modules and Google Fonts, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, the absence of visible security headers and privacy policies indicates room for improvement in security and compliance. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common but limits transparency. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security practices and clearer compliance documentation.

Detected Technologies

Framer (site generator)JavaScript modulesGoogle Fonts (Poppins, Inter)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

GasHawk operates in the blockchain technology sector, focusing on gas fee optimization and security services. Its business model appears to be SaaS-based, offering tools and analytics to blockchain users and enterprises. The target market includes blockchain developers, enterprises, and possibly DeFi participants. The presence of documentation and an app launch link suggests an active development and user engagement strategy. The company is small-sized with no public parent or subsidiary information. The lack of contact details and privacy policies may impact user trust and regulatory compliance. The company’s market position is that of an emerging technology provider with potential growth in the blockchain ecosystem.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS and secure form submission methods but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR. The WHOIS privacy protection is typical but reduces transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements in headers, policies, and incident response readiness to improve trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

GasHawk

Description:

GasHawk makes living on-chain more efficient, safe, and secure.

Key Services:
Gas fee savings analysisOn-chain security enhancementsEnterprise blockchain solutions
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Framer (site generator)JavaScript modulesGoogle Fonts (Poppins, Inter)
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • Secure form input with POST method

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Framer events tracking
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
framer.com events script
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

73/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:smtp.mail.ethermail.io ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 45 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(266 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:52.223.52.2, 35.71.142.77
Name Servers:
ns1.digitalocean.com
ns2.digitalocean.com
ns3.digitalocean.comWHOIS only
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1753999263, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:95ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:smtp.mail.ethermail.io ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Framer, a modern design and prototyping tool that generates static and dynamic content with JavaScript modules. It uses Google Fonts for typography and includes event tracking scripts from Framer. The site is moderately performant with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with proper meta tags and Open Graph data but lacks structured data like JSON-LD. Hosting details are not explicitly found. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance optimizations, as well as improved security configurations.
Analyze Another Website