Skip to main content

Is gate.io a Scam? Security Check Results - Gate Reviews

G

Is gate.io Safe? Security Analysis for Gate

Check if gate.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/alarge
React 18.2.0MobX 6.9.0Next.jsEmotion CSSGoogle Tag Manager+2 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 9:19:37 PM
67
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Gate.com is a well-established cryptocurrency exchange platform founded in 2013, offering a comprehensive suite of crypto trading and investment services including spot trading, futures, staking, lending, and innovative features like copy trading and launchpools. It serves a global audience with over 36 million users and supports more than 3,500 digital assets, positioning itself as a top ten digital currency trading platform worldwide. The website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, modern technology adoption, and strong branding consistency. Technically, Gate.com leverages modern frameworks such as React and Next.js, uses Akamai CDN for hosting, and integrates Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security. The site is fast, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, providing an excellent user experience.

Detected Technologies

React 18.2.0MobX 6.9.0Next.jsEmotion CSSGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHAAkamai CDN

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Gate operates in the finance sector, specifically in cryptocurrency exchange and trading. Its business model revolves around facilitating crypto asset trading, futures contracts, staking, and wealth management products. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its extensive asset support, large user base, and diversified product offerings. Gate maintains an active presence on multiple social media and community platforms, enhancing user engagement and brand visibility. While the WHOIS data is unavailable, the company's digital footprint and service maturity indicate a legitimate and established business. Gate's ecosystem includes partnerships with major social platforms and content channels, supporting its market position and growth trajectory.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

s*****@gate.com
b*****@gate.com

Company Registration

Registration Number:

registration number C89337

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Gate.com employs strong security measures including HTTPS enforcement, comprehensive security headers, and anti-bot protections via Google reCAPTCHA. However, the absence of a publicly accessible dedicated security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. The platform would benefit from publishing a vulnerability disclosure program and security certifications to further enhance trust. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be improved with better communication of security policies and incident handling procedures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Gate

Description:

One of the world's top ten digital currency trading platforms, focusing on the safe trading and hassle-free cryptocurrency journey

Key Services:
Spot tradingFutures tradingLaunchpoolSimple EarnStakingTrading BotsCopy TradingHODLer Airdrop
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
React 18.2.0MobX 6.9.0Next.jsEmotion CSSGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHAAkamai CDN
Frameworks:
ReactNext.js
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

excellent

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with anti-bot measures

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

73/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mail.zendesk.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 45 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
29 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(3467 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:54.95.112.227, 18.180.3.118
Name Servers:
ns-1257.awsdns-29.org
ns-1777.awsdns-30.co.uk
ns-306.awsdns-38.com
ns-769.awsdns-32.net
MX Records:
0: gate-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:96ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mail.zendesk.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring React and Next.js, ensuring a responsive and performant user experience. It uses Akamai CDN for reliable global content delivery and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is well-structured with proper meta tags and SEO optimizations. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced. No technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. The platform demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure suitable for a large-scale financial service provider.
Analyze Another Website