Skip to main content

Is gattaca.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Gattaca Reviews

G

Is gattaca.com Safe? Security Analysis for Gattaca

Check if gattaca.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Kingdomsmall
HTML5
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 6:40:24 AM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Gattaca is a small, London-based crypto technology company specializing in building trading and MEV-related infrastructure and services within the crypto transaction supply chain. The website provides minimal content focused on business description and a single contact email, indicating a niche and focused business model. The market position appears to be that of a specialized technology infrastructure provider serving crypto trading entities. Technically, the website is very basic, built with simple HTML and minimal styling, lacking modern frameworks, CMS, or advanced technical features. There is no evidence of analytics, tracking, or advertising technologies. Performance and mobile optimization are basic, and accessibility features are minimal. The site lacks SEO optimization and structured metadata. From a security perspective, the site does not display security headers or policies, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The absence of HTTPS information and security best practices lowers the security posture score. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, but the site would benefit from improved security configurations and compliance documentation. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile but lacks maturity in privacy, security, and technical sophistication. Strategic improvements in security policies, privacy compliance, and technical modernization are recommended to enhance trust and operational resilience.

Detected Technologies

HTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Gattaca operates in the crypto technology sector with a focus on transaction supply chain infrastructure and MEV-related services. The company targets crypto traders and blockchain infrastructure users, positioning itself as a specialized technology provider. The business model centers on delivering infrastructure solutions rather than consumer-facing products. The limited public information and absence of detailed corporate data suggest a small-sized enterprise with a focused market niche. No partnerships or subsidiaries are disclosed. The company maintains a professional contact email and a verified domain, indicating basic operational legitimacy. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not publicly available, limiting deeper business intelligence insights.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

c*****@gattaca.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture of the website is basic and lacks several best practices. There is no visible HTTPS enforcement confirmation, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, and no published security or incident response policies. The absence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files indicates limited transparency in security management. No forms or user input fields reduce attack surface but also limit interaction. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is not demonstrated through policy documents. The site does not appear to use tracking or analytics that could raise privacy concerns. Overall, the security maturity is low, and the company should prioritize implementing HTTPS, security headers, and publishing privacy and security policies to improve trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with strong TLS configuration and enforce HTTPS site-wide.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Gattaca

Description:

Gattaca is a research-driven crypto technology company based in London with deep experience across the transaction supply chain, primarily focused on building trading and MEV related infrastructure and services.

Key Services:
trading infrastructureMEV related infrastructurecrypto transaction supply chain services
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and primarily informational.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
email

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
28 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(52 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:160.153.128.23
Name Servers:
ns11.domaincontrol.com
ns12.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 2025061600, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:80ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is constructed with basic HTML and minimal inline CSS, lacking modern web development frameworks or CMS platforms. No JavaScript libraries or external scripts are detected, indicating a static site with limited interactivity. The absence of meta tags beyond charset and a Google site verification tag suggests minimal SEO optimization. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the content. Performance is likely moderate due to simplicity but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. The site would benefit from modernization including responsive design, semantic HTML, and integration of analytics and security features to improve user experience and operational robustness.
Analyze Another Website