Skip to main content

Is gazetadecluj.ro a Scam? Security Check Results - Ziar Gazeta de Cluj Reviews

gazetadecluj.ro favicon

Is gazetadecluj.ro Safe? Security Analysis for Ziar Gazeta de Cluj

Check if gazetadecluj.ro is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaRomaniasmall
WordPressYoast SEO pluginjQueryGoogle FontsGoogle Adsense+2 more
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 11:17:55 AM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Ziar Gazeta de Cluj is a Romanian investigative weekly newspaper focused on the Cluj county region, providing investigative journalism and news reporting primarily to Romanian-speaking audiences. The website serves as the digital platform for the newspaper, featuring news articles, investigative reports, and local content. The business model relies on advertising revenue, with Google Adsense and Adform integrated for monetization. The company appears to be a small-sized media entity with a long-standing presence since 2002, maintaining consistent branding and a professional online presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and several theme and composer plugins for layout and content management. Hosting is provided by DigitalOcean, and the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with basic accessibility features. Advertising and tracking technologies are present but limited to common ad networks and Google Tag Manager. From a security perspective, the site has HTTPS enabled but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies such as a vulnerability disclosure or incident response contact. No privacy or cookie policies were found, indicating gaps in GDPR compliance. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and no critical vulnerabilities were observed in the provided content. The domain WHOIS data is consistent with the website's business claims, showing a long registration history and reputable registrar. Overall, the website is a legitimate, professional local media outlet with good content quality and technical implementation but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEO pluginjQueryGoogle FontsGoogle AdsenseAdformGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website positions itself as a local investigative weekly newspaper serving Cluj county in Romania. Its competitive advantage lies in its investigative journalism niche and long-standing presence since 2002. The business model is primarily advertising-based, leveraging Google Adsense and Adform networks. Target customers are local Romanian-speaking residents interested in news and investigative reports. The site shows growth indicators through active content updates and social media engagement on Facebook, Reddit, Twitter, and YouTube. The partnership ecosystem includes ad networks and hosting providers but no explicit business partners or subsidiaries were identified. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing privacy compliance and security policies to build greater audience trust and meet regulatory requirements.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no evidence of a security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security. Forms are present but no explicit anti-CSRF or input validation mechanisms were observed in the HTML. Overall, the security maturity is basic and improvements are needed to align with best practices and compliance frameworks.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Ziar Gazeta de Cluj

Description:

Singurul saptamanal de investigatii din judetul Cluj

Key Services:
Investigative journalismNews reportingOnline news content
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEO pluginjQueryGoogle FontsGoogle AdsenseAdformGoogle Tag Manager
Frameworks:
td-composertd-standard-packtd-cloud-library
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies not explicitly detected

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsenseAdform
Marketing Tools:
Yoast SEO
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a Romanian investigative weekly newspaper with a focus on Cluj county.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 81 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
23 years(mature)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:157.230.28.156
Name Servers:
ns1.digitalocean.com
ns2.digitalocean.com
ns3.digitalocean.com
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1577926240, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:59ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with a well-known Newspaper theme and multiple plugins for content management and SEO. Hosting is on DigitalOcean, a reputable cloud provider. The site uses Google Fonts, jQuery, and integrates Google Adsense and Adform for advertising. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and social media integration via Open Graph and Twitter cards. Technical debt appears low but the lack of security headers and privacy policies indicates areas for modernization and compliance improvements. No critical technical risks were detected in the HTML content.
Analyze Another Website