Skip to main content

Is gcbnt.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 深圳市积加跨境网络科技有限公司 Reviews

gcbnt.com favicon

Is gcbnt.com Safe? Security Analysis for 深圳市积加跨境网络科技有限公司

Check if gcbnt.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyChinamedium
JavajQuerySwiper.jsWOW.jsLazyLoad+2 more
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 10:19:12 AM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

深圳市积加跨境网络科技有限公司运营的积加ERP官网,专注于为跨境电商品牌卖家提供多平台全渠道ERP解决方案。该公司以亚马逊平台为核心,支持接入60多个主流跨境电商平台,覆盖运营、供应链、广告及财务合规等多个业务场景。积加ERP通过统一管理和全链路深度运营,帮助中大型精品品牌商家高效管理全球业务。网站内容丰富,设计专业,展示了多项行业认证和客户案例,体现了其市场领先地位和业务成熟度。

Detected Technologies

JavajQuerySwiper.jsWOW.jsLazyLoadBaidu Analytics53KF live chat

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

积加ERP定位于跨境电商行业,特别是中大型品牌卖家,拥有90%以上亿级卖家客户占比。其业务模式结合SaaS和本地私有化部署,满足不同客户需求。公司强调业财融合和系统集成能力,支持多平台数据统一管理和深度运营分析。合作伙伴和客户案例显示其在行业内的广泛认可和技术实力。网站还展示了丰富的解决方案和技术创新,表明其持续的产品研发投入和市场扩展策略。

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (2)

186*******
400*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

网站启用了HTTPS,具备基础的安全保障。实现了Cookie同意机制,符合基本隐私合规要求。网站未公开详细安全政策或事件响应流程,且未检测到安全相关HTTP头部,存在提升空间。未发现明显安全漏洞或敏感信息泄露。WHOIS信息缺失降低了域名信任度,建议公司完善域名注册信息公开。整体安全成熟度中等,适合持续改进以满足更高合规和安全标准。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

完善WHOIS注册信息,确保域名注册数据公开透明,提升信任度。

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

深圳市积加跨境网络科技有限公司

Description:

积加ERP作为从亚马逊ERP升级的跨境电商多平台全渠道ERP,以亚马逊平台为核心,接入60+主流跨境电商平台,从跨境电商运营、供应链、广告、跨境电商财务合规等多个需求场景出发,为跨境电商品牌卖家提供多平台全渠道ERP以及ERP系统集成方案,通过全渠道统一管理,全链路深度运营,助力跨境电商卖家一个平台打理全球生意。

Key Services:
积加ERP多平台全渠道ERPERP系统集成业财融合BI及数仓开放平台API电商中台
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavajQuerySwiper.jsWOW.jsLazyLoadBaidu Analytics53KF live chat
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Baidu Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Baidu Analytics
Marketing Tools:
53KF live chat
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 84 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(158 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:120.24.21.97
Name Servers:
vip3.alidns.com
vip4.alidns.com
SOA:Serial: 2025073015, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:136ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站采用Java后端架构,前端使用jQuery、Swiper.js、WOW.js等成熟技术,支持响应式设计和移动端优化。集成了百度统计和53KF在线客服工具,提升用户交互和数据分析能力。页面结构清晰,SEO优化良好,加载性能适中。缺少CMS信息,可能为定制开发。建议优化安全头部和无障碍支持,提升整体技术成熟度和用户体验。
Analyze Another Website