Is gdchengda.com Safe? Security Analysis for 广东程达工程担保有限公司
Check if gdchengda.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

AI Summary
广东程达工程担保有限公司是一家成立于2016年的专业工程担保服务提供商,注册资金三亿元人民币,业务覆盖全国,拥有超过150亿人民币的银行授信额度。公司专注于提供投标保函、履约保函、预付款保函、支付保函等多种工程担保产品,服务超过4000家企业和20000多个项目,累计担保金额超过2000亿元。其客户涵盖大型国有企业和知名集团,市场地位稳固,业务发展迅速。技术基础采用Simpleboot3 CMS,结合Bootstrap和jQuery等现代前端技术,网站设计良好,移动端优化较好,内容丰富且结构清晰。安全方面,网站使用HTTPS,但缺乏明显的安全头部配置和隐私合规政策,存在一定的合规风险。WHOIS信息缺失,域名注册状态不明,降低了整体信任度。建议加强安全策略和合规披露以提升整体安全和信任水平。
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
该公司定位于工程担保行业,提供多样化的保函服务以满足建筑及相关行业企业的信用和风险管理需求。其商业模式基于与多家大型银行的合作,通过银行及商业保函产品为客户提供资金和履约保障。公司拥有较强的市场扩展能力和客户基础,合作伙伴涵盖国有银行和大型企业集团,显示出良好的行业认可度。网站内容专业,强调快速出函、低费用和全国通用,目标客户为需要工程担保的企业。缺乏公开的隐私政策和安全合规声明,可能影响部分客户的信任。整体业务表现出较强的成长性和市场竞争力。
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Phone Numbers (1)
Physical Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
网站启用了HTTPS,保证了数据传输的基本安全,但未检测到关键安全头部如Content-Security-Policy、X-Frame-Options等,存在潜在的安全风险。未发现隐私政策和安全事件响应联系方式,显示合规和安全管理方面存在不足。使用的第三方脚本和在线客服工具增加了潜在的攻击面,建议进行定期安全审计和漏洞扫描。缺少安全最佳实践的公开声明,可能影响客户对数据保护的信心。整体安全成熟度中等,需加强安全策略和合规措施。
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
部署并配置关键安全HTTP头部(CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options等)以提升防护能力。
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
广东程达工程担保有限公司
广东程达工程担保公司专注提供投标保函、履约保函、预付款保函、支付保函等工程担保服务,合作银行多,出函快,全国通用,费用低,安全有保障,欢迎咨询!公司成立于2016年,注册资金三亿人民币,业务覆盖全国,拥有银行授信额度超150亿人民币,服务超过4000家企业,累计担保金额超2000亿元。
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS usage assumed (URL is https)
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese language targeting engineering guarantee services.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
Email Security Check Incomplete
MEDIUMSome email security checks timed out
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 64 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Certificate Details
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings