Skip to main content

Is gedkan.eu a Scam? Security Check Results - GedKan Reviews

gedkan.eu favicon

Is gedkan.eu Safe? Security Analysis for GedKan

Check if gedkan.eu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

E-commerceLatviasmall
PrestaShopElementorGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsCookiesPlus cookie consent
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:12:34 PM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

GedKan is a specialized e-commerce business offering quality materials for candle, soap, bath bomb, and diffuser making. The website targets hobbyists and small businesses in the crafting sector, providing a wide range of products including waxes, wicks, dyes, molds, fragrance oils, and accessories. The business operates primarily in Latvia and uses PrestaShop CMS with Elementor for content management and page building. The site is well-structured with good navigation and product categorization, supporting a positive user experience.

Detected Technologies

PrestaShopElementorGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsCookiesPlus cookie consent

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

GedKan occupies a niche market in the crafting supplies sector, focusing on candle and soap making materials. Its business model is retail e-commerce, targeting individual crafters and small enterprises. The company leverages Google Ads and Analytics for marketing and user tracking, indicating a digital marketing strategy to grow its customer base. The presence of detailed product categories and multilingual support (English and Russian) suggests an intent to serve a broader European audience. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent small business.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

2*****@gedkan.eu

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712941****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism with granular consent flags, demonstrating awareness of privacy regulations. However, it lacks explicit privacy and terms of service pages, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not detected, representing an area for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be enhanced by adopting best practices and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

GedKan

Description:

Quality materials for your candles and soap. Best products to create candles, soap, bath bombs, and diffusers.

Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
PrestaShopElementorGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsCookiesPlus cookie consent
Frameworks:
PrestaShop
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular consent flags
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Ads (AW-11046513029)
Tracking Pixels:
Google Analytics (G-52N89LH35Y)
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a well-structured e-commerce platform for candle and soap making supplies.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:89.111.20.2 +ip4:89.111.24.251 +ip4:89.111.23.61 +include:_spf.mlsend.com +include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 53 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

DNS Records

A Records:89.111.24.251
Name Servers:
cloudns1.hostnet.lvDNS only
cloudns2.hostnet.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: gedkan-eu.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025062401, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:587ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:89.111.20.2 +ip4:89.111.24.251 +ip4:89.111.23.61 +include:_spf.mlsend.com +include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

GedKan's website is built on PrestaShop CMS with Elementor page builder, integrating modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics. The site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and loads assets efficiently. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO practices such as meta tags and structured data are implemented. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization of scripts and assets. Accessibility is basic, suggesting room for enhancements to meet wider user needs. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a functional and professional e-commerce platform.
Analyze Another Website