Skip to main content

Is geegees.ca a Scam? Security Check Results - uOttawa Gee-Gees Reviews

geegees.ca favicon

Is geegees.ca Safe? Security Analysis for uOttawa Gee-Gees

Check if geegees.ca is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationBarbadosmedium
jQuery 1.7Drupal CMSGoogle AnalyticsColorboxResponsiveMultiLevelMenu+4 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 6:59:33 AM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The uOttawa Gee-Gees website serves as the official portal for the University of Ottawa's sports teams and recreational activities. It targets university students and the campus community, providing bilingual access to varsity and recreational sports information. The site is built on Drupal CMS with several JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Modernizr, indicating a moderately modern technical infrastructure. However, some libraries are outdated, which may pose security risks. The website uses Google Analytics with IP anonymization, but lacks visible privacy or cookie policies, indicating gaps in privacy compliance. Security posture is moderate with domain transfer protections but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. The domain registration shows some inconsistency with the registrant country being Barbados, which does not align with the Canadian university branding, slightly reducing trust. Overall, the site is functional but would benefit from improved security, privacy policies, and technical updates.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.7Drupal CMSGoogle AnalyticsColorboxResponsiveMultiLevelMenuBootstrap 3.3.6ModernizrUnderscore.jsmmenu

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website represents an educational institution's sports and recreation sector, positioning itself as the official source for uOttawa's varsity and campus recreation activities. Its business model is informational and community-focused rather than commercial. The target audience includes students, athletes, and campus staff. The domain's long registration history supports its legitimacy. The partnership with the main university domain (uottawa.ca) strengthens its credibility. However, the lack of direct contact information and privacy policies limits user trust and engagement. The site appears to be a medium-sized operation within the education sector, with no evident subsidiaries or certifications.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is moderate. The domain has clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited statuses, which protect against unauthorized domain changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected, which are important for preventing common web attacks. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries like jQuery 1.7 introduces potential vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies were found, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Incident response and security policy information are absent, suggesting limited transparency in security governance. Overall, the site should prioritize updating libraries, enabling DNSSEC, implementing security headers, and publishing privacy and security policies to improve its security posture.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

uOttawa Gee-Gees

Description:

The website represents the University of Ottawa's Gee-Gees sports teams and recreational activities, providing access to varsity and campus recreation sectors.

Key Services:
Interuniversity varsity sports informationCampus recreational activities informationSports team links and resources
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.7Drupal CMSGoogle AnalyticsColorboxResponsiveMultiLevelMenuBootstrap 3.3.6ModernizrUnderscore.jsmmenu
Frameworks:
Drupal
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited domain status

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a university sports and recreation portal with bilingual language options.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
20 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(189 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:137.122.5.140
Name Servers:
ns1.d-zone.ca
ns2.d-zone.ca
MX Records:
10: cloud.mx.internic.ca
SOA:Serial: 2022021728, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:165ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Drupal CMS with a variety of contributed modules and JavaScript libraries including jQuery 1.7, Bootstrap 3.3.6, Modernizr, and Underscore.js. The presence of Google Analytics with IP anonymization indicates some attention to privacy. The site uses responsive design elements but mobile optimization is basic. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but older libraries may impact efficiency. Accessibility features are basic, with no explicit ARIA roles or advanced accessibility markup detected. SEO optimization is minimal with basic meta tags but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified beyond the registrar information. Overall, the technical stack is functional but dated, with modernization opportunities to improve security, performance, and compliance.
Analyze Another Website