Skip to main content

Is geokno.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Geokno India Pvt Ltd Reviews

geokno.com favicon

Is geokno.com Safe? Security Analysis for Geokno India Pvt Ltd

Check if geokno.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyIndiamedium
Google Tag ManagerjQuery 3.5.1Bootstrap 4.5.2Slick Carousel
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 7:47:50 PM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Geokno India Pvt Ltd is a specialized technology company focused on providing advanced 3D LiDAR data capturing and engineering solutions across multiple industries including energy, transport, and banking. The company leverages cutting-edge aerial, mobile, UAV, and terrestrial LiDAR technologies to deliver precise geospatial data, digital twins, analytics, and consultancy services. Positioned as a market pioneer in India, Geokno serves government and private sector clients, including large infrastructure projects and smart city initiatives. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with detailed service descriptions, client testimonials, and partnerships with the GMR Group.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerjQuery 3.5.1Bootstrap 4.5.2Slick Carousel

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Geokno operates a service-based business model targeting infrastructure, urban planning, and environmental management sectors. Their competitive advantage lies in their technological expertise and successful execution of complex projects such as high-speed rail surveys and flood management. The company benefits from strong partnerships within the GMR Group ecosystem, enhancing credibility and market reach. The website's client logos and case studies indicate a solid customer base and ongoing government collaborations. Growth potential is supported by expanding demand for geospatial analytics and digital twin technologies in India and beyond.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, but lacks visible HTTP security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms indicates partial privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in headers, privacy controls, and transparency around security policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Geokno India Pvt Ltd

Description:

Geokno is transforming geospatial data capturing using world-class 3D LiDAR technology across various industries.

Key Services:
Aerial LiDAR MappingMobile LiDAR MappingUAV LiDAR MappingTerrestrial LiDAR MappingFlood Management ConsultancyAirport GIS SolutionsSolar Rooftop Calculator
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerjQuery 3.5.1Bootstrap 4.5.2Slick Carousel
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Weak X-Content-Type-Options configuration

LOW

Current value: "nosniff, nosniff"

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "strict-origin, same-origin"

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:rua@godmarc.io
Forensic Reports:ruf@godmarc.io

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 83 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

8 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:20.207.111.113
Name Servers:
brad.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
mimi.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: geokno-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2381372906, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:62ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website employs a modern front-end stack with Bootstrap 4.5.2, jQuery 3.5.1, and Slick Carousel for responsive design and interactive elements. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation clarity and professional design. Performance is moderate with some lazy loading of images. No CMS or hosting provider details are evident from the HTML. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers, which are areas for technical improvement. Overall, the technical implementation supports a solid user experience but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy controls.
Analyze Another Website