Is geolift.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Geolift Baltic
Check if geolift.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Geolift Baltic is a specialized service provider focused on soil stabilization and foundation lifting primarily in Latvia and the Baltic region. Their website demonstrates a professional presence with clear business descriptions, multilingual support, and a focus on construction and geotechnical services. The company emphasizes quality, efficiency, and long-term guarantees, positioning itself as a niche expert in the real estate and infrastructure sectors. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools, showing a moderate to good level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS, cookie consent, and anti-spam measures, but lacks explicit security policies and headers. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-maintained, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting full domain legitimacy verification.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The company targets property owners and industrial clients needing foundation and floor stabilization services. Their business model is service-oriented with a focus on quality and efficiency, supported by a 20-year warranty. The multilingual sites indicate a regional market approach across Baltic states. The presence of testimonials and warranty claims enhances trust. The company leverages partnerships or sister sites for language localization. Revenue streams likely come from specialized construction projects. The website content and structure support a professional image with clear contact channels and service descriptions.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (2)
Phone Numbers (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent management and Google reCAPTCHA to protect user data and prevent spam. However, no explicit security headers like Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected, and no published security or incident response policies exist. The absence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt pages suggests limited formal security communication. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by adding formal policies, headers, and incident response contacts to enhance trust and compliance.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Geolift Baltic
“GEOLIFT” specializējas augsnes stabilizēšanā un grīdas, kā arī pamatu pacelšanā un izlīdzināšanā.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Cookie consent implemented
- Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
- Honeypot anti-spam field on forms
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple sections.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
No email authentication configured
CRITICALDomain is vulnerable to email spoofing
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 78 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Critical Service Exposed: MySQL
CRITICALPort 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings