Skip to main content

Is georgeandbarbarabush.org a Scam? Security Check Results - George & Barbara Bush Foundation Reviews

georgeandbarbarabush.org favicon

Is georgeandbarbarabush.org Safe? Security Analysis for George & Barbara Bush Foundation

Check if georgeandbarbarabush.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitUnited Statesmedium
JavaScriptVue.jsNuxt.jsGoogle FontsImgix (image CDN)
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:53:38 PM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The George & Barbara Bush Foundation is a US-based non-profit organization dedicated to preserving the legacy and philanthropic efforts of George and Barbara Bush. The foundation focuses on selfless service and family literacy programs, supported by donations and community engagement. The website serves as an informational and engagement platform for donors, alumni, and supporters, featuring a professional design and clear navigation. Technically, the site is built on modern frameworks such as Nuxt.js and Vue.js, hosted with reputable providers, and optimized for mobile devices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections, though improvements like DNSSEC and security headers are recommended. Privacy compliance is lacking due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security practices.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptVue.jsNuxt.jsGoogle FontsImgix (image CDN)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The foundation holds a strong market position as a legacy non-profit with historical significance. Its business model relies on donations and philanthropic initiatives, targeting a broad audience including donors, alumni, and literacy advocates. The website integrates social media channels to extend outreach and engagement. While no direct revenue streams beyond donations are evident, the foundation maintains a medium organizational size with a clear focus on education and service. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests an area for compliance improvement. The foundation's domain age and registration details align well with its operational timeline, supporting legitimacy.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

b*****@bush41.org

Phone Numbers (1)

979*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and domain locks in place. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security indicates room for enhancement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits transparency in incident response readiness. Privacy compliance gaps, including missing privacy and cookie policies, pose regulatory risks. Overall, the security posture is stable but could be strengthened to meet higher compliance and protection standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

George & Barbara Bush Foundation

Description:

The George & Barbara Bush Foundation is a non-profit organization dedicated to preserving the legacy and promoting the philanthropic efforts of George and Barbara Bush. It focuses on selfless service and family literacy through various funds and initiatives.

Key Services:
Philanthropic initiativesFamily literacy programsEvents and alumni engagementDonor support and fundraising
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptVue.jsNuxt.jsGoogle FontsImgix (image CDN)
Frameworks:
Nuxt.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP locks

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 53 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(196 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:159.223.101.226
Name Servers:
ns53.domaincontrol.com
ns54.domaincontrol.com
SOA:Serial: 2023042003, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:172ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks Nuxt.js and Vue.js, indicating a contemporary and maintainable codebase. It leverages Imgix for image CDN services and Google Fonts for typography. Hosting appears to be a combination of GoDaddy for domain registration and AWS S3 for static assets. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with structured data (JSON-LD) and Open Graph tags. However, the absence of analytics or tracking scripts suggests limited user behavior insights. Technical debt appears low, but security and privacy compliance require attention to reduce operational risks.
Analyze Another Website