Is gesr.lv Safe? Security Analysis for GESR
Check if gesr.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
GESR is a Latvian esthetic medicine and beauty clinic based in Riga, offering services such as injection procedures, skin care, and laser treatments. The website targets clients seeking professional esthetic and cosmetic medical services with a focus on certified specialists and personalized approaches. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using modern plugins like Slider Revolution, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie policy and consent mechanism present but no clear privacy or terms of service pages. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy, but the absence of WHOIS data and some compliance documentation slightly reduce confidence.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The clinic operates in the healthcare sector, specifically esthetic medicine and cosmetology, serving a local Latvian market with multilingual support (Latvian, Russian, English). Its business model revolves around direct client services in beauty and medical esthetics. The presence of social media channels and tracking tools suggests active marketing and client engagement strategies. The company emphasizes certified specialists and individualized care, positioning itself as a quality provider in a competitive local market. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The business size is small, with about 10 years of experience and a client base of approximately 5,000 satisfied customers.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Phone Numbers (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website uses HTTPS and includes standard tracking scripts but lacks advanced security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available. Forms are present but no explicit security controls or anti-CSRF measures are visible in the HTML. No vulnerabilities or exposed credentials were detected in the source. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by adding security headers, explicit policies, and incident response contacts.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
GESR
GESR ir estētiskās medicīnas un skaistuma klīnika Rīgā, piedāvājot injekciju procedūras, ādas kopšanu, lāzertehnoloģijas un individuālu pieeju ar sertificētiem preparātiem un pieredzējušiem speciālistiem.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel scripts
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a professional esthetic medicine and beauty clinic site based in Latvia.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 55 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings