Skip to main content

Is getbutton.io a Scam? Security Check Results - getbutton.io Reviews

getbutton.io favicon

Is getbutton.io Safe? Security Analysis for Chat Button for Your Website: WhatsApp, ChatGPT, Messenger | GetButton

Check if getbutton.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyMaltamedium
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptKnockout.js (data-bind attributes)Cloudflare DNS and hosting+3 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:12:59 PM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

GetButton.io is a technology company providing an all-in-one chat button solution that integrates popular messaging platforms such as WhatsApp, Messenger, Instagram, and custom AI chatbots including ChatGPT. The service targets website owners and businesses aiming to enhance visitor engagement through a unified chat interface. The platform is well-positioned in the market with over 700,000 websites reportedly using their solution, indicating strong adoption and trust. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript with Knockout.js for UI bindings, and is hosted on Cloudflare infrastructure ensuring good performance and security. The site is mobile-optimized and includes comprehensive cookie consent management powered by CookieYes, reflecting a mature approach to privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses clientTransferProhibited domain status, and provides granular cookie consent options. However, it lacks publicly available privacy policies, terms of service, security policies, and incident response contacts, which are important for full compliance and trust. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, GetButton.io presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with strong technical foundations and privacy mechanisms. To further enhance trust and compliance, the company should publish detailed privacy and security policies and provide clear contact information for security incidents.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptKnockout.js (data-bind attributes)Cloudflare DNS and hostingCookieYes for cookie consent managementFastSpring for payment processingYouTube widget API

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

GetButton.io operates as a SaaS provider in the customer engagement technology sector, focusing on chat button integration for websites. Its competitive advantage lies in supporting multiple messaging platforms and AI chatbots within a single interface, appealing to a broad range of businesses. The business model likely includes subscription or usage-based revenue streams, supported by integrations with Shopify and WordPress marketplaces. The company targets medium-sized businesses and website owners globally, with a strong presence indicated by the high number of installations. Partnerships with payment processors like FastSpring and cookie consent providers like CookieYes suggest a mature operational ecosystem. Growth indicators include continuous feature updates and multi-language support. Strategic observations highlight the need for enhanced transparency in privacy and security documentation to maintain competitive trust.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of GetButton.io is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections in place. The use of Cloudflare DNS and hosting adds resilience against common web threats. The cookie consent mechanism is comprehensive, supporting GDPR compliance with granular user controls. However, the absence of published privacy policies, terms of service, security policies, and incident response contacts represents a compliance gap and potential risk in incident handling. No known vulnerabilities or insecure libraries were detected in the provided content. The site does not expose sensitive data and uses modern frameworks. To improve security maturity, the company should implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure program, security.txt file, and detailed security policies. Overall, the site scores well but has room for improvement in transparency and formal security governance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer or main navigation.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Engage website visitors with an all-in-one chat button. Chat via WhatsApp, Custom ChatGPT, Messenger, Instagram, and more. Try GetButton.io today!

Key Services:
Chat button integrationSupport for WhatsApp, AI Chatbots, Messenger, Instagram, YouTube, and other messaging platformsCustom AI chatbot solutions
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptKnockout.js (data-bind attributes)Cloudflare DNS and hostingCookieYes for cookie consent managementFastSpring for payment processingYouTube widget API
Frameworks:
Knockout.js
Platforms:
Shopify (app link)WordPress (plugin link)
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Yandex Metrica
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
mc.webvisor.org (Yandex Metrica)
Marketing Tools:
CookieYes (cookie consent management)FastSpring (payment processing)
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website offers a multi-channel chat button service integrating popular messaging apps and AI chatbots.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.elasticemail.com include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 82 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1111 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:176.9.188.20
Name Servers:
ken.ns.cloudflare.com
pam.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2378746425, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:50ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.elasticemail.com include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web standards with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript frameworks such as Knockout.js for dynamic UI binding. It leverages Cloudflare for DNS and hosting, ensuring fast and secure delivery. External integrations include CookieYes for cookie consent management, FastSpring for payment processing, and Yandex Metrica for analytics. The site is multi-lingual with language selection implemented via cookies and URL paths. Performance is optimized with asynchronous script loading and deferred CSS. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with basic ARIA roles and labels. Technical risks are minimal, but the absence of some security headers and formal security documentation could be addressed to reduce potential attack surface and improve compliance posture.
Analyze Another Website