Skip to main content

Is getgrass.io a Scam? Security Check Results - getgrass.io Reviews

getgrass.io favicon

Is getgrass.io Safe? Security Analysis for Get rewarded for the internet you don't use

Check if getgrass.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
ReactNext.jsChakra UI
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 10:45:34 PM
72
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Grass.io is a technology company offering a unique app-based service that rewards users for sharing their unused internet bandwidth. The website presents a clear business model focused on monetizing idle internet resources through a downloadable app. The target audience is general internet users interested in earning rewards passively. The site uses modern web technologies such as React, Next.js, and Chakra UI, indicating a contemporary technical infrastructure with good mobile optimization and user experience. However, the lack of visible privacy and cookie policies, absence of contact information, and protected WHOIS data reduce transparency and trust. Security posture is moderate with no detected security headers or SSL configuration details, suggesting room for improvement in security best practices. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security measures to improve trust and credibility.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsChakra UI

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Grass.io operates in the technology sector, specifically in the niche of internet bandwidth monetization and rewards platforms. The business model revolves around incentivizing users to share unused internet capacity via an app, likely generating revenue through partnerships or data monetization. The company appears to be small-sized with no public information on founding year or parent company. The website branding is consistent and content quality is good, but the absence of detailed business information, contact details, and certifications limits full business intelligence assessment. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified. The company could enhance its market position by improving transparency and compliance documentation.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture of the Grass.io website is moderate but lacks several critical elements. There is no evidence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The SSL/TLS configuration could not be verified from the provided data. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates gaps in compliance and security readiness. The WHOIS data is protected, which while common, reduces transparency. To improve security maturity, the company should implement comprehensive security headers, ensure robust SSL configuration, publish privacy and cookie policies, and provide clear security incident contacts.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration to secure user data.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Grass turns the unused part of your internet into rewards. Just download the app, let it run in the background, and start earning.

Key Services:
internet bandwidth monetizationmobile app rewards
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsChakra UI
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, limiting domain trust analysis

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "origin-when-cross-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

47/100
Score

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:support@wynd.network
Forensic Reports:nikki@wynd.network

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

85/100
Score

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.grass.io
Issuer:Amazon RSA 2048 M04
Valid Until:5/20/2026 (256 days)
SANs:*.grass.io, grass.io

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
12 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(225 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:104.18.13.205, 104.18.12.205
AAAA Records:2606:4700::6812:ccd, 2606:4700::6812:dcd
Name Servers:
graham.ns.cloudflare.com
tina.ns.cloudflare.com
SOA:Serial: 2382325539, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:59ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern frontend technologies including React and Next.js, with Chakra UI for styling, indicating a well-structured and maintainable codebase. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO meta tags. However, there is no indication of a CMS or hosting provider from the data. Performance is moderate with deferred loading of scripts. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with more ARIA attributes and semantic HTML. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, which may be intentional for privacy. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance optimizations.
Analyze Another Website