Skip to main content

Is getsviby.com a Scam? Security Check Results - getsviby.com Reviews

getsviby.com favicon

Is getsviby.com Safe? Security Analysis for Sviby - Incredible events and experiences

Check if getsviby.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Wixcore-jsFacebook PixelMailerLite
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 3:18:51 AM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.getsviby.com appears to be a Wix-built site with minimal content and no publicly available WHOIS registration data, indicating the domain may be unregistered or very recently registered. The site lacks essential business information, contact details, and privacy or cookie policies, which significantly limits its credibility and trustworthiness. Technically, the site uses standard Wix platform technologies along with Facebook Pixel and MailerLite for marketing and tracking purposes. Security posture is moderate due to HTTPS usage but lacks advanced security headers and policies. Overall, the site presents a low-risk profile in terms of content safety but suffers from poor content quality and lack of transparency, resulting in a low overall trust and business credibility score.

Detected Technologies

Wixcore-jsFacebook PixelMailerLite

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of business descriptions, contact information, and WHOIS data, it is difficult to ascertain the market positioning or business model of the entity behind www.getsviby.com. The site does not disclose any certifications, partnerships, or strategic business information. The use of marketing tools like Facebook Pixel and MailerLite suggests an intent to engage in digital marketing, but the lack of substantive content and policies indicates an early-stage or placeholder website. No clear target audience or industry sector can be identified from the available data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, there is no evidence of additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, nor are there disclosed incident response or security policies. The absence of privacy and cookie policies raises compliance concerns, particularly with GDPR. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces potential privacy risks if not properly managed. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the security posture is basic and would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR and other regulatory compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Wixcore-jsFacebook PixelMailerLite
Platforms:
Wix.com
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Facebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Facebook Pixel
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelMailerLite
Marketing Tools:
MailerLite
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and assets.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=86400"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:mail.spf.elkdata.ee ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 67 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
0 years(young)
Expiry Risk
low(85 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:185.230.63.107
Name Servers:
ns.elkdata.ee
ns2.elkdata.ee
ns3.elkdata.net
MX Records:
10: mh4.elkdata.ee
20: mh6.elkdata.ee
SOA:Serial: 2024111301, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:59ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:mail.spf.elkdata.ee ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is hosted on the Wix platform and uses Wix's standard JavaScript libraries and assets. It includes third-party scripts for marketing and analytics, specifically Facebook Pixel and MailerLite. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. The HTML and CSS appear valid but minimal in content. There is no evidence of server-side technologies or custom frameworks beyond Wix's ecosystem. The domain's WHOIS data is missing, which is a technical red flag for domain legitimacy.
Analyze Another Website