Skip to main content

Is gezondheidziekte.com a Scam? Security Check Results - gezondheidziekte.com Reviews

G

Is gezondheidziekte.com Safe? Security Analysis for Kennis van gezondheid en ziekte - Ziekten en Voorwaarden - Voeding

Check if gezondheidziekte.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareN/asmall
HTML5CSSIconfont
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 7:03:42 AM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website gezondheidziekte.com is a Dutch-language health information portal offering a wide range of articles on health, diseases, nutrition, wellness, and medical topics. It targets the general Dutch-speaking public seeking health knowledge. The site structure is clear with categorized content but lacks advanced technical features or modern CMS frameworks. The WHOIS data is missing, indicating potential domain registration issues or privacy protection without transparency, which impacts trust. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS and security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, raising compliance concerns. Overall, the site provides basic health content but requires significant improvements in security, privacy compliance, and business transparency to enhance credibility and user trust.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSSIconfont

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Gezondheidziekte.com operates as a small-scale content publishing platform focused on healthcare information. Its market position is niche within Dutch health content, with no visible monetization or partnership disclosures. The absence of contact details and company information limits business credibility. External links to other health-related domains suggest a network of related sites but no formal partnerships are declared. The business model appears to be informational without direct commercial services. Growth potential depends on improving trust signals and compliance with privacy regulations.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website currently lacks fundamental security measures such as HTTPS encryption and security headers, exposing users to potential risks. No privacy or cookie policies are found, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. The absence of incident response contacts or security policies further weakens the security maturity. No vulnerabilities or malicious indicators are detected in the content, but the lack of security best practices and transparency poses a moderate risk to users and the business.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Website providing knowledge and articles about health, diseases, conditions, nutrition, wellness, and medical topics primarily in Dutch language.

Key Services:
Health articlesDisease and condition informationNutrition adviceWellness tipsMedical knowledge dissemination
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSSIconfont
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 37 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:gezondheidziekte.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/9/2025 (37 days)
SANs:gezondheidziekte.com, *.gezondheidziekte.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
7 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(413 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.217.15, 104.21.35.96
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3033::6815:2360, 2606:4700:3035::ac43:d90f
Name Servers:
patryk.ns.cloudflare.com
tara.ns.cloudflare.com
SOA:Serial: 2378598873, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:61ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses basic HTML and CSS with icon fonts for UI elements. No advanced JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms are detected, indicating a simple static or minimally dynamic site. The site is moderately optimized for mobile but lacks accessibility features. Performance is average with no explicit indicators of optimization or caching. The absence of meta tags beyond basic viewport and charset limits SEO potential. No external scripts or analytics tools are embedded, suggesting minimal tracking or marketing integration.
Analyze Another Website