Skip to main content

Is gfl.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Latvijas Vingrošanas Federācija Reviews

L

Is gfl.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Latvijas Vingrošanas Federācija

Check if gfl.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
WordPress 5.6.14Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerFontAwesomejQuery (commented out but referenced)+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:27:07 PM
44
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Latvijas Vingrošanas Federācija operates as the national gymnastics federation of Latvia, focusing on promoting and organizing gymnastics disciplines such as artistic gymnastics, sports gymnastics, and trampoline gymnastics. The website serves as an information hub for events, competition calendars, athlete registrations, and federation governance. The target audience includes athletes, coaches, judges, and gymnastics enthusiasts within Latvia. The federation operates as a non-profit entity providing essential services to the gymnastics community. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a custom theme (WP FanZone) and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. However, there is a lack of privacy and cookie policies, and no visible security headers, which indicates room for improvement in compliance and security posture. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, but the website branding and content appear consistent with a legitimate sports federation. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 5.6.14Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerFontAwesomejQuery (commented out but referenced)WP FanZone theme

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The federation holds a key position as the official gymnastics governing body in Latvia, organizing national competitions and managing athlete and coach licensing. Its business model is typical for a sports federation, relying on membership, event organization, and licensing. The website content reflects active engagement with the gymnastics community through news updates and event calendars. The presence of social media (Facebook) supports community outreach. The lack of detailed company registration or contact information on the site limits transparency but is common for non-profit sports organizations. The federation's market presence is national, focusing on Latvian gymnastics stakeholders. Growth indicators include recent event updates and active content publishing. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS and integrates standard tracking tools but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies were found, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. There is no visible incident response or security contact information. Forms on the site are minimal and do not show explicit anti-CSRF protections. The WordPress version is somewhat outdated (5.6.14), which may expose the site to known vulnerabilities if not patched. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in headers, policies, and platform updates to reduce risk.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Latvijas Vingrošanas Federācija

Description:

Latvijas Vingrošanas Federācija is a Latvian gymnastics federation organizing and promoting gymnastics disciplines including artistic gymnastics, sports gymnastics, and trampoline gymnastics. The site provides news, event calendars, competition results, and information about the federation's governance, members, and documents.

Key Services:
Event organization and calendar managementAthlete and coach registrationLicensing for gymnastics disciplinesInformation dissemination about competitions and resultsTraining and certification for judges and coaches
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 5.6.14Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerFontAwesomejQuery (commented out but referenced)WP FanZone theme
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URLs with https in scripts)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based site for the Latvian Gymnastics Federation.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.69.243 ip4:91.203.68.188 ip4:85.31.97.34 a mx ip4:91.203.68.160/27 -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 81 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

152 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.69.243
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: gfl.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025072200, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:73ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.69.243 ip4:91.203.68.188 ip4:85.31.97.34 a mx ip4:91.203.68.160/27 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 5.6.14 using the WP FanZone theme, with integration of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site loads CSS and JS resources from its own domain and trusted external sources like Google Fonts and FontAwesome. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear navigation structure. However, some scripts and stylesheets are loaded over HTTP rather than HTTPS, which could cause mixed content warnings. The site lacks advanced SEO meta tags and structured data (no Open Graph or JSON-LD detected). Performance is moderate, with caching plugins implied by minified cache CSS/JS files. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA roles and skip links present. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small to medium WordPress site but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Analyze Another Website