Skip to main content

Is gidonkremer.net a Scam? Security Check Results - Gidon Kremer Reviews

gidonkremer.net favicon

Is gidonkremer.net Safe? Security Analysis for Gidon Kremer

Check if gidonkremer.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
WordPressPHPjQueryWPBakery Page BuilderMonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin)
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 11:05:08 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Gidon Kremer's website serves as an official digital presence for the renowned classical violinist, providing biographical information, news updates, and event listings. The site targets classical music enthusiasts and fans, offering insights into Kremer's career and upcoming performances. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WPBakery Page Builder and uses common web technologies such as jQuery. While the site is accessible and visually consistent, it lacks key privacy and security policies, and the Google Analytics plugin is installed but not configured, indicating incomplete analytics setup. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing security headers and no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is inconsistent with the active website and reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy, security, and transparency measures.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPjQueryWPBakery Page BuilderMonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website positions Gidon Kremer as a leading figure in classical music with a strong international reputation. The business model is primarily informational and promotional, focusing on artist branding and event promotion rather than direct sales. The site links to social media channels to engage fans and disseminate news. There is no evidence of e-commerce or monetization directly on the site. The lack of detailed business contact information and privacy policies suggests a focus on public relations rather than commercial transactions. The partnership with lapulapa.lv for website creation indicates collaboration with a web development agency. The site’s market position is niche and specialized, targeting a global classical music audience.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website benefits from HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces protection against common web attacks. No forms or input fields were detected, minimizing attack surface, but also limiting user interaction. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The WHOIS data inconsistency raises questions about domain registration legitimacy. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which is a gap in security transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Gidon Kremer

Description:

Among the world’s leading violinists, Gidon Kremer has pursued an unconventional career. Born in 1947 in Riga, Latvia, he studied violin from an early age and won multiple prestigious international music competition prizes. The website presents information about his biography, upcoming events, news, writings, and records.

Key Services:
Information about concerts and eventsBiographical contentRecords and writings publication
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPjQueryWPBakery Page BuilderMonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin)
Frameworks:
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and fully functional with rich content about the artist.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 75 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:gidonkremer.net
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/15/2025 (75 days)
SANs:gidonkremer.net, *.gidonkremer.net

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
14 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(157 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.129.199, 104.21.2.229
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3034::ac43:81c7, 2606:4700:3037::6815:2e5
Name Servers:
coco.ns.cloudflare.com
doug.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: mail.gidonkremer.net
SOA:Serial: 2378212799, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:86ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using WPBakery Page Builder and jQuery libraries. The site loads CSS and JS assets from its own domain and Google Fonts CDN. The Google Analytics plugin MonsterInsights is installed but not configured, resulting in no active tracking. The site uses responsive design techniques and appears optimized for mobile devices. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimization detected. Accessibility is basic with standard HTML semantics but no advanced ARIA or accessibility features noted. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found. The site lacks security headers and privacy-related scripts or banners. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small artist website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security and privacy features.
Analyze Another Website