Is ginger.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Ginger
Check if ginger.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Ginger is a small hospitality business operating as an Asian food restaurant with multiple locations in Riga, Latvia, including Galerija Centrs, Origo, and Olimpia shopping centers. The website provides menus, location details, and contact information, targeting general consumers interested in Asian cuisine. The business appears locally focused with a straightforward restaurant service model. Technically, the website uses modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap, Font Awesome, and Leaflet for interactive maps, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile optimized and well-structured, though it lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing security headers and no visible privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and trust. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, but the website content and contact details suggest a legitimate small business. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The company operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on Asian cuisine in Riga, Latvia. It maintains multiple physical locations within prominent shopping centers, which supports a stable local market presence. The business model is direct-to-consumer restaurant service with menus tailored for each location. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies. The website lacks social media integration and advanced marketing tools, indicating a modest digital marketing approach. The presence of multiple locations and clear contact details suggests a trustworthy and established local business. Growth potential could be enhanced by expanding digital presence and improving privacy and security compliance.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Phone Numbers (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There are no visible forms or input fields on the homepage, reducing attack surface. No incident response or security policy information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. No third-party analytics or tracking scripts were detected, which reduces privacy risks but also limits marketing insights. Overall, the security posture is basic and would benefit from implementing security headers, privacy policies, and incident response contacts.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and build user trust.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Ginger
Ginger is an Asian food restaurant located in Galerija Centrs BURZMA food hall and other locations in Riga, Latvia.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS used
- No visible exposed sensitive data
- No vulnerable libraries detected in provided scripts
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Cloudflare, Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 33 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings