Skip to main content

Is giphy.com a Scam? Security Check Results - GIPHY Reviews

G

Is giphy.com Safe? Security Analysis for GIPHY

Check if giphy.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/alarge
ReactNext.jsAWS DNSFullStoryScorecardResearch+2 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 9:58:54 AM
68
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

GIPHY is a leading media platform specializing in animated GIFs, clips, and stickers that enhance digital communication by making conversations more expressive and engaging. Founded in 2012 and now a subsidiary of Meta Platforms, Inc., GIPHY serves a broad general audience with a rich content library and user-friendly creation tools. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with excellent design, mobile optimization, and SEO practices. Technically, it leverages modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted on AWS infrastructure, and integrates advanced analytics and marketing tools including FullStory and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and likely security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly disclosed. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, GIPHY presents a trustworthy, professional, and high-quality digital platform with minor areas for security transparency improvement.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsAWS DNSFullStoryScorecardResearchGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

GIPHY holds a strong market position as a premier provider of animated content, monetizing through content sharing and creation tools. Its business model focuses on user engagement and partnerships with content creators and brands. The platform targets a general audience, including individuals and businesses seeking expressive digital media. Its parent company, Meta Platforms, enhances its ecosystem integration and market reach. The company benefits from verified social media presence and a large user base, indicating growth and competitive advantage. Strategic partnerships with major media and sports entities further solidify its market presence. The absence of direct contact information suggests a focus on digital self-service and automated support channels.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

GIPHY exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and use of security analytics tools. The domain registration is consistent and trustworthy, with protective domain status flags. However, the lack of publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates potential gaps in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing security audits to mitigate risks. Enhancing security header documentation and publishing a security.txt file would improve the platform's security maturity and user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish explicit security headers and confirm their implementation to strengthen defense-in-depth.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

GIPHY

Description:

GIPHY is the platform that animates your world. Find the GIFs, Clips, and Stickers that make your conversations more positive, more expressive, and more you.

Key Services:
GIF search and sharingSticker and clip creationContent upload and creation tools
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsAWS DNSFullStoryScorecardResearchGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel
Frameworks:
Next.js
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers (likely)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security analytics tools (FullStory)

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
FullStoryScorecardResearchGoogle Analytics (implied via GTM)Facebook Analytics (via Pixel)
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelScorecardResearch
Marketing Tools:
FullStory
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15465600"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

65/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

82/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.mailgun.org include:_spf.eu.mailgun.org include:servers.mcsv.net exists:%{i}._spf.mta.salesforce.com -all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:add78bd9e2@rua.easydmarc.us
Forensic Reports:dmarc-reports@shutterstock.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
12 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(3004 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:151.101.129.91, 151.101.65.91, 151.101.193.91, 151.101.1.91
Name Servers:
ns-1507.awsdns-60.org
ns-1872.awsdns-42.co.uk
ns-688.awsdns-22.net
ns-8.awsdns-01.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:88ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.mailgun.org include:_spf.eu.mailgun.org include:servers.mcsv.net exists:%{i}._spf.mta.salesforce.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern tech stack including React and Next.js, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile responsiveness. Hosting on AWS provides scalable and reliable infrastructure. The site uses advanced analytics and marketing tools for user behavior tracking and engagement optimization. SEO is well supported through comprehensive metadata and structured data. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced. No technical debt or legacy technology indicators were found. Opportunities exist to improve security header visibility and incident response readiness to reduce technical risks.
Analyze Another Website