Skip to main content

Is gipsowo.pl a Scam? Security Check Results - gipsowo.pl Reviews

G

Is gipsowo.pl Safe? Security Analysis for Waiting for the redirectiron...

Check if gipsowo.pl is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
JavaScriptHTML5CSS3
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:28:19 PM
39
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website gipsowo.pl currently presents a security challenge page that blocks direct access to its content, indicating the presence of a Web Application Firewall or similar security mechanism. The visible content is minimal, showing only a redirect countdown and a browser integrity check script. The site references outdated CMS versions (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) in its metadata, suggesting it has not been updated in many years. No meaningful business information, contact details, or privacy policies are accessible, limiting the ability to assess the company's operations or compliance posture. The domain registration data is public and consistent, with a creation date in 2015 and no privacy protection, but the lack of accessible content reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the site appears inactive or under maintenance with a security layer preventing full analysis.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptHTML5CSS3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the security challenge blocking access, no substantive business intelligence can be derived from the website content. The domain is registered to Globtel Internet Szymon Hersztek, but no company branding or business description is available. The site metadata references Joomla and WordPress CMS platforms, but no active business model, target audience, or market positioning is discernible. The lack of contact information and policies further limits insights into operational or strategic aspects.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs a security challenge page, likely a WAF, to protect against automated access or attacks, which is a positive security measure. However, the site shows no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or modern security headers in the provided content. The use of outdated CMS versions poses significant security risks if the site were accessible. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps. Incident response and security contact information are absent. Overall, the security posture is weak beyond the WAF protection, with critical improvements needed in platform updates, secure configurations, and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all traffic.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page shows a security check with automatic redirect and browser integrity check script, indicating a WAF or security challenge blocking direct access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Description:

Joomla!

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptHTML5CSS3
Frameworks:
Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5
Performance:

slow

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
20/100
Best Practices:
  • Browser integrity check script
  • Automatic redirect with countdown

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked by a security challenge page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.webd.pl -all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
10 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(265 days)

DNS Records

A Records:194.181.228.80
Name Servers:
ns5.webd.plDNS only
ns7.webd.plDNS only
MX Records:
0: gipsowo.pl

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses legacy CMS platforms (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) as indicated by meta tags, which are no longer supported and pose security risks. The page content is minimal and primarily consists of JavaScript-based redirect and browser integrity checks, typical of a WAF challenge page. No modern analytics, tracking, or advertising technologies are detected. The hosting provider is identified as Globtel Internet Szymon Hersztek from WHOIS data. Performance and mobile optimization are poor due to the lack of substantive content and outdated technology. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are also lacking. The technical infrastructure requires modernization and security hardening.
Analyze Another Website