Skip to main content

Is gitbook.com a Scam? Security Check Results - GitBook Reviews

gitbook.com favicon

Is gitbook.com Safe? Security Analysis for GitBook

Check if gitbook.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
Framer (generator)Amplitude AnalyticsHubSpotGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 5:26:16 AM
69
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

GitBook is a technology-focused SaaS platform that provides product documentation solutions with a branch-based Git workflow favored by software and product teams. The website demonstrates a professional design and integrates modern analytics and marketing tools such as Amplitude, HubSpot, and Google Analytics, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced, though explicit security headers and public security policies are not evident in the provided content. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly that slightly reduces trust but does not detract from the overall legitimacy of the business as indicated by the website content. Strategic recommendations include enhancing transparency around privacy and security policies and publishing vulnerability disclosure information.

Detected Technologies

Framer (generator)Amplitude AnalyticsHubSpotGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

GitBook operates in the technology sector, targeting software development and product teams needing collaborative documentation tools. Its SaaS business model leverages integrations with Git workflows to differentiate itself in a competitive market. The company appears to maintain a medium-sized operation with consistent branding and a clear value proposition. The use of advanced analytics and marketing platforms suggests a focus on growth and customer engagement. However, the lack of publicly accessible contact information and privacy policies in the analyzed content may impact user trust and compliance perception.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses reputable analytics and marketing services, which is positive for security and data handling. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options in the HTML content is a gap that should be addressed. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is publicly available, which limits transparency and readiness perception. The missing WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration transparency but may be due to privacy protection services. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in policy transparency and technical security controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publicly disclose comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

GitBook

Description:

Forget building and maintaining your own custom docs platform. With GitBook you get beautiful documentation for your users, and a branch-based Git workflow your team will love.

Key Services:
product documentation platformbranch-based Git workflow integrationcollaborative docs
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Framer (generator)Amplitude AnalyticsHubSpotGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
AmplitudeGoogle AnalyticsHubSpot
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
HubSpotAmplitude
Marketing Tools:
HubSpot
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

73/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net include:stspg-customer.com include:helpscoutemail.com -all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:johan@gitbook.com
Forensic Reports:johan@gitbook.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 82 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:gitbook.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/28/2025 (82 days)
SANs:gitbook.com, *.gitbook.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DNS Records

A Records:104.18.41.89, 172.64.146.167
AAAA Records:2606:4700:4404::6812:2959, 2a06:98c1:310d::ac40:92a7
Name Servers:
dahlia.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
hugh.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382179179, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:66ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net include:stspg-customer.com include:helpscoutemail.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Framer for design and layout, integrating analytics and marketing tools such as Amplitude, HubSpot, and Google Analytics. The site uses modern web fonts and is optimized for mobile devices with responsive design. Performance is moderate, with no obvious broken elements or errors in the provided content. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. Hosting provider and CMS are not explicitly identified. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from additional security hardening and transparency measures.
Analyze Another Website