Skip to main content

Is github.com a Scam? Security Check Results - GitHub, Inc. Reviews

github.com favicon

Is github.com Safe? Security Analysis for GitHub, Inc.

Check if github.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statesenterprise
ReactJavaScriptCSSContentful CMSAWS DNS+1 more
Analyzed 8/11/2025Completed 4:53:35 PM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

GitHub, Inc. operates one of the world's leading AI-powered developer platforms, enabling millions of developers and businesses to build, collaborate, and ship software efficiently. Positioned as a market leader in software development collaboration, GitHub offers a comprehensive suite of services including code hosting, code review, CI/CD automation, security scanning, and AI-assisted coding tools. The platform targets developers, enterprises, and the open source community globally, leveraging a robust business model centered on platform-as-a-service offerings and enterprise solutions. Owned by Microsoft, GitHub maintains a strong market presence with a large user base and extensive partner ecosystem. Technically, GitHub employs a modern technology stack featuring React, Contentful CMS, and AWS hosting, ensuring fast performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility. The website demonstrates excellent SEO practices and a consistent, professional design that enhances user experience. Security is a priority, with HTTPS enforced, comprehensive security headers, and enterprise-grade security features. The domain registration is consistent with GitHub's corporate identity, and the site maintains transparency through detailed privacy, cookie, and security policies. The security posture is strong, with no detected vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. GitHub follows best practices including a vulnerability disclosure program and incident response contacts. Minor improvements such as enabling DNSSEC could further enhance DNS security. Overall, the website and platform exhibit high maturity in security, privacy compliance, and technical infrastructure. The overall risk assessment is low, reflecting GitHub's established reputation, robust security measures, and compliance with privacy regulations. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, continuous monitoring of third-party scripts, and maintaining up-to-date security policies to sustain trust and security culture.

Detected Technologies

ReactJavaScriptCSSContentful CMSAWS DNSNS1 DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

GitHub holds a dominant position in the developer collaboration market, leveraging its extensive user base and integration with Microsoft to offer enterprise-grade solutions. Its business model focuses on subscription-based services for teams and enterprises, supplemented by free access for open source projects. GitHub's competitive advantages include its AI-powered tools, comprehensive security features, and seamless integration with CI/CD workflows. Revenue streams derive from paid plans, enterprise offerings, and add-ons such as GitHub Advanced Security and Copilot for Business. The target customer segments range from individual developers to large enterprises across various industries. Growth indicators include continuous feature innovation and expansion into AI and security domains. The partnership ecosystem includes technology providers and service partners, enhancing platform capabilities and market reach.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

s*****@github.com
a*****@github.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

GitHub demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, strong domain registration protections, and comprehensive security headers. The presence of a vulnerability disclosure program and dedicated incident response contacts indicates readiness to handle security incidents. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is evident through detailed policies and consent mechanisms. No exposed credentials or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. The site employs secure forms and input handling, minimizing risk of injection attacks. Minor gaps include the absence of DNSSEC, which could be addressed to strengthen DNS integrity. Overall, GitHub's security culture and practices align with industry standards for enterprise platforms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the github.com domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

GitHub, Inc.

Description:

Join the world's most widely adopted, AI-powered developer platform where millions of developers, businesses, and the largest open source community build software that advances humanity.

Key Services:
Git repository hostingCode reviewCI/CD automationSecurity scanningAI-powered coding assistance
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactJavaScriptCSSContentful CMSAWS DNSNS1 DNS
Frameworks:
ReactPrimer CSS
Platforms:
GitHub platformAWS
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientDeleteProhibited domain status
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • ClientUpdateProhibited domain status
  • Security policy and incident response contacts
  • Vulnerability disclosure program

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
OctolyticsFullStory
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Octolytics
Marketing Tools:
FullStory
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

75/100
Score

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "0"

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "origin-when-cross-origin, strict-origin-when-cross-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphoneform

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

22/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:192.30.252.0/22 include:_netblocks.google.com include:_netblocks2.google.com include:_netblocks3.google.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:mktomail.com ip 4:62.253.227.114 ip4:166.78.69.169 ip4:166.78.69.170 ip4:166.78.71.131 ip4:167.89.101.2 ip4:167.89.101.192/28 ip4:192.254.112.60 ip4:192.254.112.98/31 ip4:192.254.113.10 ip4:192.254.113.101 ip4:192.254.114.176 ~all
DNS Lookups:8/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1408-bit rsa)
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@github.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

54/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

HSTS Missing includeSubDomains

LOW

HSTS header does not include subdomains

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
17 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(416 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:140.82.121.3
Name Servers:
dns1.p08.nsone.net
dns2.p08.nsone.net
dns3.p08.nsone.net
dns4.p08.nsone.net
ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
ns-421.awsdns-52.com
ns-520.awsdns-01.net
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern React-based frontend with CSS frameworks like Primer CSS, supported by Contentful CMS for content management. Hosting is provided by AWS with DNS managed via NS1 and AWS DNS services. Performance is optimized with preconnect and preload directives, and assets are served from dedicated GitHub asset domains. The site is mobile-optimized and includes accessibility considerations such as keyboard shortcuts and ARIA attributes. SEO is well implemented with comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. The technical infrastructure reflects a mature, scalable platform with minimal technical debt and strong operational resilience.
Analyze Another Website