Skip to main content

Is give.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Council of Better Business Bureaus Reviews

C

Is give.org Safe? Security Analysis for Council of Better Business Bureaus

Check if give.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitUnited Statesmedium
Bootstrap 4 and 5jQuery 3.7.1Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerConstant Contact forms+2 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 9:49:35 AM
69
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

BBB Wise Giving Alliance, operated by the Council of Better Business Bureaus, is a reputable non-profit organization focused on evaluating and accrediting charities to promote wise giving. The website serves donors and the general public by providing charity ratings, reports, and trusted advice backed by over 100 years of experience. It holds a strong market position as a trusted charity evaluator with a recognized BBB Accredited Charity Seal. The digital infrastructure is built on Sitefinity CMS with modern web technologies including Bootstrap and jQuery, hosted on AWS infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a professional user experience with clear navigation and comprehensive content. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and domain protections in place, though DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are not explicitly detected. Privacy compliance is good with a comprehensive privacy policy, though a cookie consent mechanism is absent. Overall, the website demonstrates high business credibility and trustworthiness.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 4 and 5jQuery 3.7.1Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerConstant Contact formsSitefinity CMS 12.2.7232.0 PECustom JavaScript for UI interactions

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The organization operates in the non-profit sector, providing essential services in charity evaluation and accreditation. Its business model is based on providing free charity reports and licensing the BBB Accredited Charity Seal to qualifying organizations. The target audience includes donors seeking trustworthy charities and charities seeking accreditation. The website's content and services indicate a medium-sized organization with a long history since 1995. Partnerships include GiveSafely.io for donation facilitation. The organization maintains a strong brand presence with consistent messaging and multiple trust indicators such as social media channels and detailed charity standards.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

e*****@site.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and has domain transfer protections enabled. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, representing an area for improvement. The site uses secure forms with client-side validation and integrates third-party marketing tools like Constant Contact and Google Analytics responsibly. There is no public incident response or security policy page, which could enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened with additional headers and DNS security.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Council of Better Business Bureaus

Description:

BBB Wise Giving Alliance (BBB’s Give.org) is a standards-based charity evaluator that seeks to verify the trustworthiness of publicly-soliciting charities.

Key Services:
Charity evaluationCharity accreditationCharity ratings and reportsDonor adviceCharity accreditation seal licensing
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 4 and 5jQuery 3.7.1Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerConstant Contact formsSitefinity CMS 12.2.7232.0 PECustom JavaScript for UI interactions
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
Sitefinity CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with validation
  • Privacy policy present

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Constant Contact
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spfbbblist.bbb.org include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mailgun.org include:_spf.questionpro.com ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
30 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(252 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:35.171.235.26, 18.211.177.109
Name Servers:
ns-1342.awsdns-39.org
ns-1553.awsdns-02.co.uk
ns-213.awsdns-26.com
ns-553.awsdns-05.net
MX Records:
10: give-org.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:49ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spfbbblist.bbb.org include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mailgun.org include:_spf.questionpro.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Sitefinity CMS platform, leveraging Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, and Constant Contact for email marketing forms. Hosting is via AWS as indicated by DNS servers. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive layouts and accessible navigation. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The code includes custom JavaScript for UI enhancements and form validation. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided data.
Analyze Another Website