Skip to main content

Is glamour.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Glamour Reviews

glamour.com favicon

Is glamour.com Safe? Security Analysis for Glamour

Check if glamour.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/alarge
JavaScriptGoogle Publisher Tags (GPT)Fides Consent ManagementKendra Event Bus
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 4:01:49 AM
67
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Glamour.com is a prominent media website focusing on women's issues, fashion, beauty, politics, and entertainment news. It operates under the Condé Nast umbrella, a globally recognized media company. The site targets a female audience with rich editorial content and multimedia features. The business model is primarily advertising and content-driven, leveraging Condé Nast's brand strength and partnerships. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript frameworks, consent management tools, and ad serving technologies, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The website is well-optimized for mobile and SEO, with a professional design and clear navigation. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is used, but explicit security headers and privacy policies are not evident in the provided content. The absence of public WHOIS data is unusual but likely due to privacy protection or registry policies rather than malicious intent. Overall, Glamour.com presents as a trustworthy, professional media property with room for improvement in transparency and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle Publisher Tags (GPT)Fides Consent ManagementKendra Event Bus

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Glamour.com holds a strong market position as a leading women's lifestyle and news brand under Condé Nast. Its competitive advantage lies in high-quality editorial content and a broad audience reach. Revenue streams are primarily advertising-based, supported by partnerships with major ad networks and tracking services. The target customer segment is women interested in fashion, beauty, politics, and entertainment. Growth indicators include integration of advanced consent management and analytics tools. The partnership ecosystem includes sister Condé Nast brands like GQ, Vogue, Vanity Fair, and Wired, enhancing cross-promotional opportunities. Strategic observations suggest continued investment in digital content and compliance frameworks will sustain market relevance.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

h*****@newyorker.com

Phone Numbers (1)

180*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of consent management frameworks. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The site uses third-party scripts for ads and analytics, which require ongoing monitoring for supply chain risks. Privacy compliance is partially implemented via consent banners but lacks explicit privacy and terms of service documentation in the analyzed content. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with recommendations to enhance header policies, transparency, and incident readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Glamour

Description:

Glamour.com is your source for what matters to women now, from outfit ideas and makeup tutorials to celebrity news and politics.

Key Services:
newsfashion contentbeauty tutorialspolitical commentaryentertainment news
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle Publisher Tags (GPT)Fides Consent ManagementKendra Event Bus
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS implied by canonical URL and og:url

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Parsely
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google DoubleClick
Tracking Pixels:
Parsely
Marketing Tools:
Fides Consent Management
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a major media brand owned by Condé Nast.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_u.glamour.com._spf.smart.ondmarc.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1408-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:a6816915@inbox.ondmarc.com
Forensic Reports:a6816915@inbox.ondmarc.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

90/100
Score

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

6 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:glamour.com
Issuer:Amazon RSA 2048 M04
Valid Until:6/18/2026 (286 days)
SANs:glamour.com, *.glamour.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:151.101.64.239, 151.101.128.239, 151.101.192.239, 151.101.0.239
Name Servers:
ns-1116.awsdns-11.orgDNS only
ns-1935.awsdns-49.co.ukDNS only
ns-28.awsdns-03.comDNS only
ns-836.awsdns-40.netDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:78ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_u.glamour.com._spf.smart.ondmarc.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The site uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with event bus architecture and advanced font loading strategies. It integrates Google Publisher Tags for advertising and Parsely for analytics, indicating a sophisticated ad and data ecosystem. Consent management is handled by Fides, customized extensively for branding and regional compliance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple third-party scripts. No CMS or hosting provider details were explicitly detected. Technical risks include reliance on external ad and tracking services and incomplete security header implementation.
Analyze Another Website