Skip to main content

Is gleanin.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Gleanin Reviews

gleanin.com favicon

Is gleanin.com Safe? Security Analysis for Gleanin

Check if gleanin.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Google AnalyticsHubSpotLinkedIn Insight TagWebflow CMSCookieConsent+4 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 8:03:26 AM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Gleanin operates a Community Marketing platform aimed at event marketers seeking to increase attendee engagement and sell out digital events. The website presents a professional and modern interface, leveraging a variety of marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot, Google Analytics, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The technical infrastructure is built on Webflow CMS and hosted on Webflow's platform, ensuring a responsive and moderately performant user experience. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and standard security headers, although explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and registration status, which should be verified to enhance trust. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid business presence with room for improvement in transparency and direct contact information.

Detected Technologies

Google AnalyticsHubSpotLinkedIn Insight TagWebflow CMSCookieConsentVimeoClearbitLeadInLinkedIn Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Gleanin targets the niche market of event marketers with a SaaS-based community marketing platform designed to boost digital event attendance and engagement. The business model focuses on subscription-based access to marketing automation tools tailored for events. The website content and structure suggest a small-sized technology company with a clear market positioning in event marketing technology. The use of multiple marketing and analytics integrations indicates a mature digital marketing strategy. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data and direct contact details may impact customer trust and business credibility. No evidence of parent or subsidiary companies was found, and no certifications or compliance frameworks are explicitly mentioned.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (1)

+4433333*****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and includes essential security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security and Content-Security-Policy. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or security.txt file limits transparency regarding security governance. The lack of direct security contact channels may hinder effective incident reporting and response. Overall, the security posture is solid for a small SaaS platform but would benefit from enhanced documentation and communication of security practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive terms of service and security policy page to improve transparency.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Gleanin

Description:

Gleanin provides a Community Marketing platform designed to help global event marketers increase attendees and create sell-out digital events.

Key Services:
Community Marketing platformDigital event attendee engagementEvent marketing automation
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google AnalyticsHubSpotLinkedIn Insight TagWebflow CMSCookieConsentVimeoClearbitLeadInLinkedIn Analytics
Frameworks:
Webflow
Platforms:
HubSpot
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsHubSpot AnalyticsLinkedIn Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
LinkedIn Insight TagClearbit
Marketing Tools:
HubSpotLeadInClearbit
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

100/100
Score
No issues found

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:amazonses.com include:email.chargebee.com include:_spf.google.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:7244067.spf10.hubspotemail.net ~all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@gleanin.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 33 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:75.2.70.75, 99.83.190.102
Name Servers:
ns-108.awsdns-13.comDNS only
ns-1472.awsdns-56.orgDNS only
ns-1783.awsdns-30.co.ukDNS only
ns-865.awsdns-44.netDNS only
MX Records:
30: aspmx3.googlemail.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
30: aspmx2.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:91ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:amazonses.com include:email.chargebee.com include:_spf.google.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:7244067.spf10.hubspotemail.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Webflow CMS and hosted on Webflow's infrastructure, utilizing modern web technologies and integrations with marketing and analytics platforms such as HubSpot, Google Analytics, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized. SEO practices are good with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The use of multiple third-party scripts introduces a dependency risk that should be monitored for vulnerabilities. No critical technical debt or outdated technologies were identified.
Analyze Another Website