Skip to main content

Is gleap.io a Scam? Security Check Results - Gleap Reviews

gleap.io favicon

Is gleap.io Safe? Security Analysis for Gleap

Check if gleap.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
JavaScriptWebflow CMSGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebotPaddle (payment processing)+2 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 8:27:30 PM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Gleap is a technology company providing an AI-powered customer support operating system designed to enhance support workflows with AI bots, live chat, bug reporting, surveys, help centers, and product roadmapping. Positioned as a cost-effective alternative to established platforms like Intercom, Gleap targets technology companies and product teams seeking modern, AI-native support solutions. The website demonstrates a high level of digital maturity, leveraging modern web technologies such as Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for consent management, and integrated payment and analytics services like Paddle and ProfitWell. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly disclosed. Overall, the site is professional, well-structured, and optimized for performance and mobile use, reflecting a trustworthy SaaS business with a focus on AI-driven customer engagement.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptWebflow CMSGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebotPaddle (payment processing)ProfitWell (subscription analytics)Gleap SDK

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Gleap operates in the competitive SaaS customer support market, emphasizing AI integration to differentiate itself. Its business model revolves around subscription-based services with tiered pricing, targeting small to medium-sized tech startups and product teams. The company leverages partnerships with payment processors and analytics providers to streamline operations. Testimonials and competitor comparisons on the site indicate a strategic positioning as a more affordable yet feature-rich alternative. The absence of direct contact information suggests a digital-first customer engagement approach. The company’s ecosystem includes integrations and a public roadmap, indicating transparency and customer-centric development. Growth indicators include adoption by over 4500 global tech startups and continuous feature enhancements.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration, uses Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant consent management, and integrates security best practices such as no exposed sensitive data and absence of vulnerable libraries. However, the lack of a public security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency in security governance. No security.txt or dedicated security contact channels were found. The site’s security headers are not fully visible in the HTML but likely managed by the hosting provider. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by publishing explicit security documentation and establishing clear incident response contacts to enhance trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Gleap

Description:

Gleap powers modern support workflows with AI bots, live chat, bug reporting, surveys, help centers, and product roadmapping. All built to unite teams and delight users.

Key Services:
AI support botAI copilotLive chatBug reportingSurveysHelp centerProduct roadmappingOnboarding toolsMarketing automation
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptWebflow CMSGoogle Tag ManagerCookiebotPaddle (payment processing)ProfitWell (subscription analytics)Gleap SDK
Frameworks:
Webflow
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cookiebot for consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag ManagerProfitWell
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
CookiebotProfitWell
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:7d378fe3624e.a@dmarcinput.com
Forensic Reports:7d378fe3624e.f@dmarcinput.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 59 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
4 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(715 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:198.202.211.1
Name Servers:
zac.ns.cloudflare.com
zoe.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382277954, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:72ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Webflow CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and integrations such as Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Paddle for payments, and ProfitWell for subscription analytics. The site is well optimized for mobile devices and demonstrates fast loading times. The use of embedded iframes for demos and product showcases indicates a rich interactive experience. Technical debt appears minimal with no deprecated or vulnerable libraries detected. Opportunities for modernization include enhancing accessibility features and expanding security header implementations. The technical infrastructure supports a scalable SaaS platform with a focus on user engagement and AI-powered support capabilities.
Analyze Another Website